| Message ID | f63e9b72de6922682206b4315af8ca9af6f2522e.1659084730.git.maciek@thing.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware: cherry pick gcc 12.x compatibility patches | expand |
Hi, Thanks for the patch. The subject should just start with "arm/edk2-firmware:", and each of the patches you’re adding need an Upstream-Status tag (in this case, Upstream-Status: Backport), and *your* Signed-off-by. Thanks, Ross > On 29 Jul 2022, at 09:58, Maciej Borzęcki via lists.yoctoproject.org <maciek=thing.com@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote: > > Cherry pick gcc 12.x compatibility patches from the upstream. > > Signed-off-by: Maciej Borzecki <maciek@thing.com> > --- > meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc | 3 ++ > ...001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch | 37 +++++++++++++++ > .../0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch | 45 ++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch > create mode 100644 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch > create mode 100644 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch > > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc > index 540eb00cb0972761ee2addfe78d9ab51e4ba3e73..0a6ae277a1de7d20cc1a9c5b9984b19fb489e7ef 100644 > --- a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc > @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ SRC_URI = "\ > ${EDK2_SRC_URI};name=edk2;destsuffix=edk2;nobranch=1 \ > ${EDK2_PLATFORMS_SRC_URI};name=edk2-platforms;destsuffix=edk2/edk2-platforms;nobranch=1 \ > file://unaligned.patch \ > + file://0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch \ > + file://0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch \ > + file://0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch \ > " > > SRCREV_FORMAT = "edk2_edk2-platforms" > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e63a79338586c259f26afeb734daa234ab384e4f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ > +From 22130dcd98b4d4b76ac8d922adb4a2dbc86fa52c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > +Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:04:36 +0800 > +Subject: [PATCH] Basetools: turn off gcc12 warning > + > +In function ?SetDevicePathEndNode?, > + inlined from ?FileDevicePath? at DevicePathUtilities.c:857:5: > +DevicePathUtilities.c:321:3: error: writing 4 bytes into a region of size 1 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] > + 321 | memcpy (Node, &mUefiDevicePathLibEndDevicePath, sizeof (mUefiDevicePathLibEndDevicePath)); > + | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > +In file included from UefiDevicePathLib.h:22, > + from DevicePathUtilities.c:16: > +../Include/Protocol/DevicePath.h: In function ?FileDevicePath?: > +../Include/Protocol/DevicePath.h:51:9: note: destination object ?Type? of size 1 > + 51 | UINT8 Type; ///< 0x01 Hardware Device Path. > + | ^~~~ > + > +Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > +Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > +--- > + BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile | 3 +++ > + 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > + > +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile b/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile > +index 7ca08af9662d..b05d2bddfa68 100644 > +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile > ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile > +@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ OBJECTS = DevicePath.o UefiDevicePathLib.o DevicePathFromText.o DevicePathUtili > + > + include $(MAKEROOT)/Makefiles/app.makefile > + > ++# gcc 12 trips over device path handling > ++BUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-error=stringop-overflow > ++ > + LIBS = -lCommon > + ifeq ($(CYGWIN), CYGWIN) > + LIBS += -L/lib/e2fsprogs -luuid > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22297c67bb6ca798f4b177867d99610294320cc8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +From 85021f8cf22d1bd4114803c6c610dea5ef0059f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > +Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:04:35 +0800 > +Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools: fix gcc12 warning > + > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c: In function ?LzmaEnc_CodeOneMemBlock?: > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2828:19: error: storing the address of local variable ?outStream? in ?*p.rc.outStream? [-Werror=dangling-pointer=] > + 2828 | p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; > + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?outStream? declared here > + 2811 | CLzmaEnc_SeqOutStreamBuf outStream; > + | ^~~~~~~~~ > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?pp? declared here > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2828:19: error: storing the address of local variable ?outStream? in ?*(CLzmaEnc *)pp.rc.outStream? [-Werror=dangling-pointer=] > + 2828 | p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; > + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?outStream? declared here > + 2811 | CLzmaEnc_SeqOutStreamBuf outStream; > + | ^~~~~~~~~ > +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?pp? declared here > +cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > + > +Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > +Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > +--- > + BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c | 3 ++- > + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > + > +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c > +index 4e9b499f8d80..4b9f5fa69248 100644 > +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c > ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c > +@@ -2825,12 +2825,13 @@ SRes LzmaEnc_CodeOneMemBlock(CLzmaEncHandle pp, BoolInt reInit, > + > + nowPos64 = p->nowPos64; > + RangeEnc_Init(&p->rc); > +- p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; > + > + if (desiredPackSize == 0) > + return SZ_ERROR_OUTPUT_EOF; > + > ++ p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; > + res = LzmaEnc_CodeOneBlock(p, desiredPackSize, *unpackSize); > ++ p->rc.outStream = NULL; > + > + *unpackSize = (UInt32)(p->nowPos64 - nowPos64); > + *destLen -= outStream.rem; > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..77e1d97b2f57820fbe96b7309782fc89690457d2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ > +From 7b005f344e533cd913c3ca05b266f9872df886d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > +Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:04:34 +0800 > +Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools: fix gcc12 warning > + > +GenFfs.c:545:5: error: pointer ?InFileHandle? used after ?fclose? [-Werror=use-after-free] > + 545 | Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated of %s", InFileHandle); > + | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > +GenFfs.c:544:5: note: call to ?fclose? here > + 544 | fclose (InFileHandle); > + | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > +Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > +--- > + BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c | 2 +- > + BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c | 2 +- > + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > + > +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c > +index 949025c33325..d78d62ab3689 100644 > +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c > ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c > +@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ GetAlignmentFromFile(char *InFile, UINT32 *Alignment) > + PeFileBuffer = (UINT8 *) malloc (PeFileSize); > + if (PeFileBuffer == NULL) { > + fclose (InFileHandle); > +- Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated of %s", InFileHandle); > ++ Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated for %s", InFile); > + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; > + } > + fread (PeFileBuffer, sizeof (UINT8), PeFileSize, InFileHandle); > +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c > +index d54a4f9e0a7d..b1d05367ec0b 100644 > +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c > ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c > +@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ GetAlignmentFromFile(char *InFile, UINT32 *Alignment) > + PeFileBuffer = (UINT8 *) malloc (PeFileSize); > + if (PeFileBuffer == NULL) { > + fclose (InFileHandle); > +- Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated of %s", InFileHandle); > ++ Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated for %s", InFile); > + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; > + } > + fread (PeFileBuffer, sizeof (UINT8), PeFileSize, InFileHandle); > -- > 2.37.1 > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#3608): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/message/3608 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/92687028/6875888 > Group Owner: meta-arm+owner@lists.yoctoproject.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/unsub [ross.burton@arm.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc index 540eb00cb0972761ee2addfe78d9ab51e4ba3e73..0a6ae277a1de7d20cc1a9c5b9984b19fb489e7ef 100644 --- a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ SRC_URI = "\ ${EDK2_SRC_URI};name=edk2;destsuffix=edk2;nobranch=1 \ ${EDK2_PLATFORMS_SRC_URI};name=edk2-platforms;destsuffix=edk2/edk2-platforms;nobranch=1 \ file://unaligned.patch \ + file://0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch \ + file://0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch \ + file://0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch \ " SRCREV_FORMAT = "edk2_edk2-platforms" diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e63a79338586c259f26afeb734daa234ab384e4f --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +From 22130dcd98b4d4b76ac8d922adb4a2dbc86fa52c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> +Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:04:36 +0800 +Subject: [PATCH] Basetools: turn off gcc12 warning + +In function ?SetDevicePathEndNode?, + inlined from ?FileDevicePath? at DevicePathUtilities.c:857:5: +DevicePathUtilities.c:321:3: error: writing 4 bytes into a region of size 1 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] + 321 | memcpy (Node, &mUefiDevicePathLibEndDevicePath, sizeof (mUefiDevicePathLibEndDevicePath)); + | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +In file included from UefiDevicePathLib.h:22, + from DevicePathUtilities.c:16: +../Include/Protocol/DevicePath.h: In function ?FileDevicePath?: +../Include/Protocol/DevicePath.h:51:9: note: destination object ?Type? of size 1 + 51 | UINT8 Type; ///< 0x01 Hardware Device Path. + | ^~~~ + +Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> +Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> +--- + BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile | 3 +++ + 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) + +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile b/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile +index 7ca08af9662d..b05d2bddfa68 100644 +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/GNUmakefile +@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ OBJECTS = DevicePath.o UefiDevicePathLib.o DevicePathFromText.o DevicePathUtili + + include $(MAKEROOT)/Makefiles/app.makefile + ++# gcc 12 trips over device path handling ++BUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-error=stringop-overflow ++ + LIBS = -lCommon + ifeq ($(CYGWIN), CYGWIN) + LIBS += -L/lib/e2fsprogs -luuid diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22297c67bb6ca798f4b177867d99610294320cc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +From 85021f8cf22d1bd4114803c6c610dea5ef0059f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> +Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:04:35 +0800 +Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools: fix gcc12 warning + +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c: In function ?LzmaEnc_CodeOneMemBlock?: +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2828:19: error: storing the address of local variable ?outStream? in ?*p.rc.outStream? [-Werror=dangling-pointer=] + 2828 | p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?outStream? declared here + 2811 | CLzmaEnc_SeqOutStreamBuf outStream; + | ^~~~~~~~~ +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?pp? declared here +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2828:19: error: storing the address of local variable ?outStream? in ?*(CLzmaEnc *)pp.rc.outStream? [-Werror=dangling-pointer=] + 2828 | p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?outStream? declared here + 2811 | CLzmaEnc_SeqOutStreamBuf outStream; + | ^~~~~~~~~ +Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c:2811:28: note: ?pp? declared here +cc1: all warnings being treated as errors + +Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> +Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> +--- + BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c | 3 ++- + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c +index 4e9b499f8d80..4b9f5fa69248 100644 +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/LzmaCompress/Sdk/C/LzmaEnc.c +@@ -2825,12 +2825,13 @@ SRes LzmaEnc_CodeOneMemBlock(CLzmaEncHandle pp, BoolInt reInit, + + nowPos64 = p->nowPos64; + RangeEnc_Init(&p->rc); +- p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; + + if (desiredPackSize == 0) + return SZ_ERROR_OUTPUT_EOF; + ++ p->rc.outStream = &outStream.vt; + res = LzmaEnc_CodeOneBlock(p, desiredPackSize, *unpackSize); ++ p->rc.outStream = NULL; + + *unpackSize = (UInt32)(p->nowPos64 - nowPos64); + *destLen -= outStream.rem; diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..77e1d97b2f57820fbe96b7309782fc89690457d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +From 7b005f344e533cd913c3ca05b266f9872df886d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> +Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:04:34 +0800 +Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools: fix gcc12 warning + +GenFfs.c:545:5: error: pointer ?InFileHandle? used after ?fclose? [-Werror=use-after-free] + 545 | Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated of %s", InFileHandle); + | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +GenFfs.c:544:5: note: call to ?fclose? here + 544 | fclose (InFileHandle); + | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> +Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> +--- + BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c | 2 +- + BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c | 2 +- + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c +index 949025c33325..d78d62ab3689 100644 +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFfs/GenFfs.c +@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ GetAlignmentFromFile(char *InFile, UINT32 *Alignment) + PeFileBuffer = (UINT8 *) malloc (PeFileSize); + if (PeFileBuffer == NULL) { + fclose (InFileHandle); +- Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated of %s", InFileHandle); ++ Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated for %s", InFile); + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; + } + fread (PeFileBuffer, sizeof (UINT8), PeFileSize, InFileHandle); +diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c +index d54a4f9e0a7d..b1d05367ec0b 100644 +--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c ++++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenSec/GenSec.c +@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ GetAlignmentFromFile(char *InFile, UINT32 *Alignment) + PeFileBuffer = (UINT8 *) malloc (PeFileSize); + if (PeFileBuffer == NULL) { + fclose (InFileHandle); +- Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated of %s", InFileHandle); ++ Error(NULL, 0, 4001, "Resource", "memory cannot be allocated for %s", InFile); + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; + } + fread (PeFileBuffer, sizeof (UINT8), PeFileSize, InFileHandle);
Cherry pick gcc 12.x compatibility patches from the upstream. Signed-off-by: Maciej Borzecki <maciek@thing.com> --- meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc | 3 ++ ...001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch | 37 +++++++++++++++ .../0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ .../0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch | 45 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0001-Basetools-turn-off-gcc12-warning.patch create mode 100644 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0002-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch create mode 100644 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/files/0003-BaseTools-fix-gcc12-warning.patch