[master,1/2] linux: remove old unused patches

diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/0001-gcc-plugins-Fix-build-for-upcoming-GCC-release.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/0001-gcc-plugins-Fix-build-for-upcoming-GCC-release.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 3dfa31a1..00000000
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/0001-gcc-plugins-Fix-build-for-upcoming-GCC-release.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ 
-From 3cd29a3d7c25cca9989e7d8966141f725fa99c68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 09:30:33 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: Fix build for upcoming GCC release
-
-The upcoming GCC release has refactored the gimple plugin interface a
-bit and unless gimple-iterator.h is included before gimple-fold.h I end
-up with a bunch of missing declarations when building the stack
-protector plugin.
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport [https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230113173033.4380-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/]
-Reported-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
-Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230113173033.4380-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
-Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
-Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
----
- scripts/gcc-plugins/gcc-common.h | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
---- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/gcc-common.h
-+++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/gcc-common.h
-@@ -108,7 +108,9 @@
- #include "varasm.h"
- #include "stor-layout.h"
- #include "internal-fn.h"
-+#include "gimple.h"
- #include "gimple-expr.h"
-+#include "gimple-iterator.h"
- #include "gimple-fold.h"
- #include "context.h"
- #include "tree-ssa-alias.h"
-@@ -124,13 +126,10 @@
- #include "gimplify.h"
- #endif
-
--#include "gimple.h"
--
- #if BUILDING_GCC_VERSION >= 4009
- #include "tree-ssa-operands.h"
- #include "tree-phinodes.h"
- #include "tree-cfg.h"
--#include "gimple-iterator.h"
- #include "gimple-ssa.h"
- #include "ssa-iterators.h"
- #endif
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index e1e04c34..00000000
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,111 +0,0 @@ 
-
-Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
-kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
-
-[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-
-Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
-
-
-
-From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
- failures
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-Hi,
-
-binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
-perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
-
-Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
-
-util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
-util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
- 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
-      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
-/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
-  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
-      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-with equivalent failures in
-
-tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
-tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
-
-The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
-new signature.
-
-However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
-once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
-here.
-
-Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
-solution.
-
-Greetings,
-
-Andres Freund
----
-
-binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
-which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
-
-Relevant binutils commit: [1]
-
-There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
-This is a work-around for older kernels.
-
-[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
-[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
-
-
- tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@
- #include <bfd.h>
- #include <dis-asm.h>
- 
-+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
-+{
-+  va_list args;
-+  int r;
-+
-+  va_start(args, fmt);
-+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
-+  va_end(args);
-+
-+  return r;
-+}
-+
- static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-				   struct annotate_args *args)
- {
-@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-		goto out;
-	}
-	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
--			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
-+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
-+                  fprintf_styled);
- 
-	info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
-	info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
--- 
-2.17.1
-