diff mbox series

[meta-ti,master] linux-ti-staging: Clean up init_disassemble_info() patch

Message ID 20221204211439.9271-1-reatmon@ti.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: Ryan Eatmon
Headers show
Series [meta-ti,master] linux-ti-staging: Clean up init_disassemble_info() patch | expand

Commit Message

Ryan Eatmon Dec. 4, 2022, 9:14 p.m. UTC
There were fuzz errors with the patch that needed to be cleaned up,
and for some reason a v2 that was supposed to move the duplicate
patches in files/ was not pushed properly before merging.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
---
 ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch |   8 +-
 ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch | 109 ------------------
 ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch | 109 ------------------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 222 deletions(-)
 rename meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/{linux-ti-staging-5.10 => files}/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch (92%)
 delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
 delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch

Comments

Denys Dmytriyenko Dec. 4, 2022, 10:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 03:14:39PM -0600, Ryan Eatmon via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> There were fuzz errors with the patch that needed to be cleaned up,
> and for some reason a v2 that was supposed to move the duplicate

Yeah, I was wondering where did v2 go... :)


> patches in files/ was not pushed properly before merging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
> ---
>  ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch |   8 +-
>  ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch | 109 ------------------
>  ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch | 109 ------------------
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 222 deletions(-)
>  rename meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/{linux-ti-staging-5.10 => files}/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch (92%)
>  delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>  delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> similarity index 92%
> rename from meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> rename to meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> index a8054125..33dee03a 100644
> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>  index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>  --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>  +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> +@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@
>   #include <bfd.h>
>   #include <dis-asm.h>
>   
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>  +}
>  +
>   static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
> -                                   struct annotate_args *args)
> +				   struct annotate_args *args)
>   {
>  @@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>  		goto out;
> @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>  +			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
>  +                  fprintf_styled);
>   
> -        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
> -        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
> +	info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
> +	info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
>  -- 
>  2.17.1
>  
> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> deleted file mode 100644
> index a8054125..00000000
> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
> -
> -Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
> -kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
> -
> -[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
> -
> -Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
> -
> -
> -
> -From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> -From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
> -Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
> -Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
> - failures
> -MIME-Version: 1.0
> -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> -
> -Hi,
> -
> -binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
> -perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
> -
> -Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
> -
> -util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
> -util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
> - 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
> -      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
> -/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
> -  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
> -      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -
> -with equivalent failures in
> -
> -tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
> -tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
> -
> -The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
> -new signature.
> -
> -However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
> -once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
> -here.
> -
> -Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
> -solution.
> -
> -Greetings,
> -
> -Andres Freund
> ----
> -
> -binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
> -which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
> -
> -Relevant binutils commit: [1]
> -
> -There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
> -This is a work-around for older kernels.
> -
> -[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
> -[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
> -
> -Upstream-Status: Pending
> -Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
> -
> -
> - tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> -
> -diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
> ---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> - #include <bfd.h>
> - #include <dis-asm.h>
> - 
> -+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
> -+{
> -+  va_list args;
> -+  int r;
> -+
> -+  va_start(args, fmt);
> -+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
> -+  va_end(args);
> -+
> -+  return r;
> -+}
> -+
> - static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
> -                                   struct annotate_args *args)
> - {
> -@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
> --			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
> -+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
> -+                  fprintf_styled);
> - 
> -        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
> -        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
> --- 
> -2.17.1
> -
> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> deleted file mode 100644
> index a8054125..00000000
> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
> -
> -Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
> -kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
> -
> -[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
> -
> -Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
> -
> -
> -
> -From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> -From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
> -Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
> -Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
> - failures
> -MIME-Version: 1.0
> -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> -
> -Hi,
> -
> -binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
> -perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
> -
> -Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
> -
> -util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
> -util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
> - 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
> -      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
> -/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
> -  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
> -      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -
> -with equivalent failures in
> -
> -tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
> -tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
> -
> -The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
> -new signature.
> -
> -However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
> -once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
> -here.
> -
> -Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
> -solution.
> -
> -Greetings,
> -
> -Andres Freund
> ----
> -
> -binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
> -which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
> -
> -Relevant binutils commit: [1]
> -
> -There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
> -This is a work-around for older kernels.
> -
> -[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
> -[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
> -
> -Upstream-Status: Pending
> -Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
> -
> -
> - tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> -
> -diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
> ---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> -@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> - #include <bfd.h>
> - #include <dis-asm.h>
> - 
> -+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
> -+{
> -+  va_list args;
> -+  int r;
> -+
> -+  va_start(args, fmt);
> -+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
> -+  va_end(args);
> -+
> -+  return r;
> -+}
> -+
> - static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
> -                                   struct annotate_args *args)
> - {
> -@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
> --			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
> -+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
> -+                  fprintf_styled);
> - 
> -        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
> -        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
> --- 
> -2.17.1
> -
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
Ryan Eatmon Dec. 4, 2022, 10:52 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12/4/2022 16:40, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 03:14:39PM -0600, Ryan Eatmon via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> There were fuzz errors with the patch that needed to be cleaned up,
>> and for some reason a v2 that was supposed to move the duplicate
> 
> Yeah, I was wondering where did v2 go... :)

I have no clue.  I must not have done a git push --force after fixing 
the commit, but I sent the email.  It was a long week last week.


>> patches in files/ was not pushed properly before merging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch |   8 +-
>>   ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch | 109 ------------------
>>   ...ture-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch | 109 ------------------
>>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 222 deletions(-)
>>   rename meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/{linux-ti-staging-5.10 => files}/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch (92%)
>>   delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>>   delete mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> similarity index 92%
>> rename from meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> rename to meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> index a8054125..33dee03a 100644
>> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>   index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>>   --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>   +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
>> +@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@
>>    #include <bfd.h>
>>    #include <dis-asm.h>
>>    
>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>>   +}
>>   +
>>    static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>> -                                   struct annotate_args *args)
>> +				   struct annotate_args *args)
>>    {
>>   @@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>>   		goto out;
>> @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>>   +			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
>>   +                  fprintf_styled);
>>    
>> -        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
>> -        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
>> +	info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
>> +	info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
>>   --
>>   2.17.1
>>   
>> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index a8054125..00000000
>> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
>> -
>> -Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
>> -kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
>> -
>> -[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
>> -
>> -Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
>> -
>> -
>> -
>> -From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> -From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>> -Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
>> -Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
>> - failures
>> -MIME-Version: 1.0
>> -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> -
>> -Hi,
>> -
>> -binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
>> -perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
>> -
>> -Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
>> -
>> -util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
>> -util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
>> - 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
>> -      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> -In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
>> -/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
>> -  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
>> -      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> -
>> -with equivalent failures in
>> -
>> -tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
>> -tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
>> -
>> -The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
>> -new signature.
>> -
>> -However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
>> -once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
>> -here.
>> -
>> -Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
>> -solution.
>> -
>> -Greetings,
>> -
>> -Andres Freund
>> ----
>> -
>> -binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
>> -which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
>> -
>> -Relevant binutils commit: [1]
>> -
>> -There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
>> -This is a work-around for older kernels.
>> -
>> -[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
>> -[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
>> -
>> -Upstream-Status: Pending
>> -Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
>> -
>> -
>> - tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> -
>> -diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>> ---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
>> - #include <bfd.h>
>> - #include <dis-asm.h>
>> -
>> -+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
>> -+{
>> -+  va_list args;
>> -+  int r;
>> -+
>> -+  va_start(args, fmt);
>> -+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
>> -+  va_end(args);
>> -+
>> -+  return r;
>> -+}
>> -+
>> - static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>> -                                   struct annotate_args *args)
>> - {
>> -@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>> -		goto out;
>> -	}
>> -	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
>> --			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
>> -+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
>> -+                  fprintf_styled);
>> -
>> -        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
>> -        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
>> ---
>> -2.17.1
>> -
>> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index a8054125..00000000
>> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
>> -
>> -Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
>> -kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
>> -
>> -[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
>> -
>> -Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
>> -
>> -
>> -
>> -From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> -From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>> -Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
>> -Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
>> - failures
>> -MIME-Version: 1.0
>> -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> -
>> -Hi,
>> -
>> -binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
>> -perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
>> -
>> -Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
>> -
>> -util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
>> -util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
>> - 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
>> -      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> -In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
>> -/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
>> -  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
>> -      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> -
>> -with equivalent failures in
>> -
>> -tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
>> -tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
>> -
>> -The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
>> -new signature.
>> -
>> -However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
>> -once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
>> -here.
>> -
>> -Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
>> -solution.
>> -
>> -Greetings,
>> -
>> -Andres Freund
>> ----
>> -
>> -binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
>> -which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
>> -
>> -Relevant binutils commit: [1]
>> -
>> -There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
>> -This is a work-around for older kernels.
>> -
>> -[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
>> -[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
>> -
>> -Upstream-Status: Pending
>> -Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
>> -
>> -
>> - tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> -
>> -diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
>> ---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> -@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
>> - #include <bfd.h>
>> - #include <dis-asm.h>
>> -
>> -+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
>> -+{
>> -+  va_list args;
>> -+  int r;
>> -+
>> -+  va_start(args, fmt);
>> -+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
>> -+  va_end(args);
>> -+
>> -+  return r;
>> -+}
>> -+
>> - static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>> -                                   struct annotate_args *args)
>> - {
>> -@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
>> -		goto out;
>> -	}
>> -	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
>> --			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
>> -+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
>> -+                  fprintf_styled);
>> -
>> -        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
>> -        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
>> ---
>> -2.17.1
>> -
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
similarity index 92%
rename from meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
rename to meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
index a8054125..33dee03a 100644
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
+++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/files/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@  diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
 index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
 --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
 +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
+@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@
  #include <bfd.h>
  #include <dis-asm.h>
  
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@  index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
 +}
 +
  static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-                                   struct annotate_args *args)
+				   struct annotate_args *args)
  {
 @@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
 		goto out;
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@  index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
 +			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
 +                  fprintf_styled);
  
-        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
-        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
+	info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
+	info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
 -- 
 2.17.1
 
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a8054125..00000000
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@ 
-
-Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
-kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
-
-[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
-
-Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
-
-
-
-From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
- failures
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-Hi,
-
-binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
-perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
-
-Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
-
-util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
-util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
- 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
-      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
-/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
-  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
-      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-with equivalent failures in
-
-tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
-tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
-
-The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
-new signature.
-
-However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
-once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
-here.
-
-Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
-solution.
-
-Greetings,
-
-Andres Freund
----
-
-binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
-which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
-
-Relevant binutils commit: [1]
-
-There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
-This is a work-around for older kernels.
-
-[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
-[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
-
-
- tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
- #include <bfd.h>
- #include <dis-asm.h>
- 
-+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
-+{
-+  va_list args;
-+  int r;
-+
-+  va_start(args, fmt);
-+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
-+  va_end(args);
-+
-+  return r;
-+}
-+
- static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-                                   struct annotate_args *args)
- {
-@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-		goto out;
-	}
-	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
--			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
-+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
-+                  fprintf_styled);
- 
-        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
-        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
--- 
-2.17.1
-
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a8054125..00000000
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-systest-5.10/init_disassemble_info-signature-changes-causes-compile-failures.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@ 
-
-Adaption of a patch [A] applied to meta-arm for the kernel.  But since TI has it's own
-kernel we have to "adjust" the patch to match our files.
-
-[A] https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/arm/patch/20220824025819.4888-1-jon.mason@arm.com/#5104
-
-Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
-
-
-
-From 1b2013986271de39360cf79e62ed9b7d2cc59f9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:18 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH] init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile
- failures
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-Hi,
-
-binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
-perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
-
-Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
-
-util/annotate.c: In function ?symbol__disassemble_bpf?:
-util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ?init_disassemble_info?
- 1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
-      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
-/usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
-  472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
-      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-with equivalent failures in
-
-tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
-tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
-
-The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
-new signature.
-
-However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
-once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
-here.
-
-Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
-solution.
-
-Greetings,
-
-Andres Freund
----
-
-binutils 2.39 changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(),
-which now causes perf and bpftool to fail to compile.
-
-Relevant binutils commit: [1]
-
-There is a proper fix in development upstream[2].
-This is a work-around for older kernels.
-
-[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
-[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220801013834.156015-1-andres@anarazel.de/
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@arm.com>
-
-
- tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-index 308189454788..6573d2b07548 100644
---- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
-@@ -1685,6 +1685,18 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
- #include <bfd.h>
- #include <dis-asm.h>
- 
-+static int fprintf_styled(void *, enum disassembler_style, const char* fmt, ...)
-+{
-+  va_list args;
-+  int r;
-+
-+  va_start(args, fmt);
-+  r = vprintf(fmt, args);
-+  va_end(args);
-+
-+  return r;
-+}
-+
- static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-                                   struct annotate_args *args)
- {
-@@ -1727,7 +1739,8 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
-		goto out;
-	}
-	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
--			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
-+			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
-+                  fprintf_styled);
- 
-        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
-        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
--- 
-2.17.1
-