new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+Backport of:
+
+From bc6b36682f188020ee4770fae1d41bde5b2c97bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>
+Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 19:18:36 -0700
+Subject: Correct the check of pthread_create()'s return value.
+
+This function returns a positive number (errno) on error, so the code
+wasn't previously freeing some memory in this situation.
+
+Discussion:
+
+ https://stackoverflow.com/a/3581020/14760867
+
+Credit for finding this bug in libpsx goes to David Gstir of
+X41 D-Sec GmbH (https://x41-dsec.de/) who performed a security
+audit of the libcap source code in April of 2023. The audit
+was sponsored by the Open Source Technology Improvement Fund
+(https://ostif.org/).
+
+Audit ref: LCAP-CR-23-01 (CVE-2023-2602)
+
+Signed-off-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [import from ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcap2/tree/debian/patches/CVE-2023-2602.patch?h=ubuntu/focal-security
+Upstream commit https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libcap/libcap.git/commit/?id=bc6b36682f188020ee4770fae1d41bde5b2c97bb]
+CVE: CVE-2023-2602
+Signed-off-by: Vijay Anusuri <vanusuri@mvista.com>
+---
+ psx/psx.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/libcap/psx.c
++++ b/libcap/psx.c
+@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int psx_pthread_create(pthread_t *thread
+
+ psx_wait_for_idle();
+ int ret = pthread_create(thread, attr, start_routine, arg);
+- if (ret != -1) {
++ if (ret == 0) {
+ psx_do_registration(*thread);
+ }
+ psx_resume_idle();
+@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ int __wrap_pthread_create(pthread_t *thr
+ void *(*start_routine) (void *), void *arg) {
+ psx_wait_for_idle();
+ int ret = __real_pthread_create(thread, attr, start_routine, arg);
+- if (ret != -1) {
++ if (ret == 0) {
+ psx_do_registration(*thread);
+ }
+ psx_resume_idle();
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+Backport of:
+
+From 422bec25ae4a1ab03fd4d6f728695ed279173b18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>
+Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 19:44:22 -0700
+Subject: Large strings can confuse libcap's internal strdup code.
+
+Avoid something subtle with really long strings: 1073741823 should
+be enough for anybody. This is an improved fix over something attempted
+in libcap-2.55 to address some static analysis findings.
+
+Reviewing the library, cap_proc_root() and cap_launcher_set_chroot()
+are the only two calls where the library is potentially exposed to a
+user controlled string input.
+
+Credit for finding this bug in libcap goes to Richard Weinberger of
+X41 D-Sec GmbH (https://x41-dsec.de/) who performed a security audit
+of the libcap source code in April of 2023. The audit was sponsored
+by the Open Source Technology Improvement Fund (https://ostif.org/).
+
+Audit ref: LCAP-CR-23-02 (CVE-2023-2603)
+
+Signed-off-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [import from ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcap2/tree/debian/patches/CVE-2023-2603.patch?h=ubuntu/focal-security
+Upstream commit https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libcap/libcap.git/commit/?id=422bec25ae4a1ab03fd4d6f728695ed279173b18]
+CVE: CVE-2023-2603
+Signed-off-by: Vijay Anusuri <vanusuri@mvista.com>
+---
+ libcap/cap_alloc.c | 12 +++++++-----
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/libcap/cap_alloc.c
++++ b/libcap/cap_alloc.c
+@@ -76,13 +76,22 @@ cap_t cap_init(void)
+ char *_libcap_strdup(const char *old)
+ {
+ __u32 *raw_data;
++ size_t len;
+
+ if (old == NULL) {
+ errno = EINVAL;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+- raw_data = malloc( sizeof(__u32) + strlen(old) + 1 );
++ len = strlen(old);
++ if ((len & 0x3fffffff) != len) {
++ _cap_debug("len is too long for libcap to manage");
++ errno = EINVAL;
++ return NULL;
++ }
++ len += sizeof(__u32) + 1;
++
++ raw_data = malloc(len);
+ if (raw_data == NULL) {
+ errno = ENOMEM;
+ return NULL;
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/${BPN}2/${BPN}-${
file://0001-ensure-the-XATTR_NAME_CAPS-is-defined-when-it-is-use.patch \
file://0002-tests-do-not-run-target-executables.patch \
file://0001-tests-do-not-statically-link-a-test.patch \
+ file://CVE-2023-2602.patch \
+ file://CVE-2023-2603.patch \
"
SRC_URI[md5sum] = "7416119c9fdcfd0e8dd190a432c668e9"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "1005e3d227f2340ad1e3360ef8b69d15e3c72a29c09f4894d7aac038bd26e2be"