@@ -650,6 +650,7 @@ do_prepare_recipe_sysroot[deptask] = "do_populate_sysroot"
python do_prepare_recipe_sysroot () {
bb.build.exec_func("extend_recipe_sysroot", d)
}
+do_prepare_recipe_sysroot[vardepsexclude] += "extend_recipe_sysroot"
addtask do_prepare_recipe_sysroot before do_configure after do_fetch
python staging_taskhandler() {
@@ -665,6 +666,7 @@ python staging_taskhandler() {
deps = d.getVarFlag(task, "depends")
if task == "do_configure" or (deps and "populate_sysroot" in deps):
d.prependVarFlag(task, "prefuncs", "extend_recipe_sysroot ")
+ d.appendVarFlag(task, "vardepsexclude", " extend_recipe_sysroot")
}
staging_taskhandler[eventmask] = "bb.event.RecipeTaskPreProcess"
addhandler staging_taskhandler
@@ -700,4 +702,3 @@ python target_add_sysroot_deps () {
d.setVar("HASHEQUIV_EXTRA_SIGDATA", "\n".join("%s: %s" % (k, deps[k]) for k in sorted(deps.keys())))
}
SSTATECREATEFUNCS += "target_add_sysroot_deps"
-
'do_prepare_recipe_sysroot' did not declare this explicitly, but made use of the fact, that 'extend_recipe_sysroot' is ignored on the base hash level. Also for cached tasks, when prepending them with 'extend_recipe_sysroot', exclude it from their signatures. Signed-off-by: Adam Blank <adam.blank.g@gmail.com> --- meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)