| Message ID | 20250625222916.11663-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Commit | 561447c7cc1485366dbf41cfbf8dcc1cbf29d043 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | spdx30_tasks: Change recipe license to declared | expand |
Looks like this might have gotten missed? On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 4:29 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com> wrote: > Per discussion with the SPDX licensing group, recipe LICENSE statements > classify as a declared license, not a concluded license. > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com> > --- > meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py > index beeafc2bb7c..5d9f3168d97 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py > @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ def create_spdx(d): > ) > build_objset.new_relationship( > source_files, > - oe.spdx30.RelationshipType.hasConcludedLicense, > + oe.spdx30.RelationshipType.hasDeclaredLicense, > [oe.sbom30.get_element_link_id(recipe_spdx_license)], > ) > > -- > 2.49.0 > >
On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 9:34 PM CEST, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Looks like this might have gotten missed? > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 4:29 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com> wrote: > I see it merged: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=561447c7cc14
Ah, OK. I was just being silly and missed the _other_ place it needed to be changed On Wed, Jul 30, 2025, 3:57 AM Mathieu Dubois-Briand < mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com> wrote: > On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 9:34 PM CEST, Joshua Watt via > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Looks like this might have gotten missed? > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 4:29 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I see it merged: > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=561447c7cc14 >
diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py index beeafc2bb7c..5d9f3168d97 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py +++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ def create_spdx(d): ) build_objset.new_relationship( source_files, - oe.spdx30.RelationshipType.hasConcludedLicense, + oe.spdx30.RelationshipType.hasDeclaredLicense, [oe.sbom30.get_element_link_id(recipe_spdx_license)], )
Per discussion with the SPDX licensing group, recipe LICENSE statements classify as a declared license, not a concluded license. Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com> --- meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)