@@ -279,21 +279,21 @@ def collect_dep_recipes(d, doc, spdx_recipe):
deps = oe.spdx_common.get_spdx_deps(d)
- for dep_pn, dep_hashfn, in_taskhash in deps:
+ for dep in deps:
# If this dependency is not calculated in the taskhash skip it.
# Otherwise, it can result in broken links since this task won't
# rebuild and see the new SPDX ID if the dependency changes
- if not in_taskhash:
+ if not dep.in_taskhash:
continue
- dep_recipe_path = oe.sbom.doc_find_by_hashfn(deploy_dir_spdx, package_archs, "recipe-" + dep_pn, dep_hashfn)
+ dep_recipe_path = oe.sbom.doc_find_by_hashfn(deploy_dir_spdx, package_archs, "recipe-" + dep.pn, dep.hashfn)
if not dep_recipe_path:
- bb.fatal("Cannot find any SPDX file for recipe %s, %s" % (dep_pn, dep_hashfn))
+ bb.fatal("Cannot find any SPDX file for recipe %s, %s" % (dep.pn, dep.hashfn))
spdx_dep_doc, spdx_dep_sha1 = oe.sbom.read_doc(dep_recipe_path)
for pkg in spdx_dep_doc.packages:
- if pkg.name == dep_pn:
+ if pkg.name == dep.pn:
spdx_dep_recipe = pkg
break
else:
The common SPDX code was changed to return a dataclass for dependency information instead of a namedtuple, but the SPDX 2.2 was missed to account for this. Correct the SPDX 2.2 code to correctly handle the new datatype Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com> --- meta/classes/create-spdx-2.2.bbclass | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)