diff mbox series

[v1,2/2] perf: tests: fix qa error, missing perl

Message ID 20240325102055.1037135-2-max.oss.09@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [v1,1/2] perf: fix build with latest kernel | expand

Commit Message

Max Krummenacher March 25, 2024, 10:20 a.m. UTC
From: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>

Kernel commit 61d348f1e96f ("perf testsuite: Add common output checking
helpers") added with 6.9-rc1 added addional testscripts written in perl.

Fixes:
| ERROR: perf-1.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.pl contained in package perf-tests requires /usr/bin/perl, but no providers found in RDEPENDS:perf-tests? [file-rdeps]

Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>
---
 meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Richard Purdie March 26, 2024, 5:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 11:20 +0100, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> From: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>
> 
> Kernel commit 61d348f1e96f ("perf testsuite: Add common output checking
> helpers") added with 6.9-rc1 added addional testscripts written in perl.
> 
> Fixes:
> > ERROR: perf-1.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.pl contained in package perf-tests requires /usr/bin/perl, but no providers found in RDEPENDS:perf-tests? [file-rdeps]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> index 6408c65462..4b6834e614 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ RDEPENDS:${PN} += "elfutils bash"
>  RDEPENDS:${PN}-archive =+ "bash"
>  RDEPENDS:${PN}-python =+ "bash python3 python3-modules ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'audit', 'audit-python', '', d)}"
>  RDEPENDS:${PN}-perl =+ "bash perl perl-modules"
> -RDEPENDS:${PN}-tests =+ "python3 bash"
> +RDEPENDS:${PN}-tests =+ "perl python3 bash"
>  
>  RSUGGESTS:${PN} += "${PN}-archive ${PN}-tests \
>                      ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'perl', '${PN}-perl', '', d)} \

Does perf avoid perl dependencies currently? Would it make more sense
to put that script in ${PN}-perl?

Cheers,

Richard
Max Krummenacher March 28, 2024, 5:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:10 PM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 11:20 +0100, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> > From: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>
> >
> > Kernel commit 61d348f1e96f ("perf testsuite: Add common output checking
> > helpers") added with 6.9-rc1 added addional testscripts written in perl.
> >
> > Fixes:
> > > ERROR: perf-1.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.pl contained in package perf-tests requires /usr/bin/perl, but no providers found in RDEPENDS:perf-tests? [file-rdeps]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> > index 6408c65462..4b6834e614 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> > @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ RDEPENDS:${PN} += "elfutils bash"
> >  RDEPENDS:${PN}-archive =+ "bash"
> >  RDEPENDS:${PN}-python =+ "bash python3 python3-modules ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'audit', 'audit-python', '', d)}"
> >  RDEPENDS:${PN}-perl =+ "bash perl perl-modules"
> > -RDEPENDS:${PN}-tests =+ "python3 bash"
> > +RDEPENDS:${PN}-tests =+ "perl python3 bash"
> >
> >  RSUGGESTS:${PN} += "${PN}-archive ${PN}-tests \
> >                      ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'perl', '${PN}-perl', '', d)} \
>
> Does perf avoid perl dependencies currently? Would it make more sense
> to put that script in ${PN}-perl?

There's a packageconfig which enables the ${PN}-perl content. Whatever
that stuff is used for.

However kernel 6.9-rc1 added new *.pl files which are called from a
shell script deployed into ${PN}-tests. So I think those new perl
scripts need to go into ${PN}-tests.

Regards
Max

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
index 6408c65462..4b6834e614 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@  RDEPENDS:${PN} += "elfutils bash"
 RDEPENDS:${PN}-archive =+ "bash"
 RDEPENDS:${PN}-python =+ "bash python3 python3-modules ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'audit', 'audit-python', '', d)}"
 RDEPENDS:${PN}-perl =+ "bash perl perl-modules"
-RDEPENDS:${PN}-tests =+ "python3 bash"
+RDEPENDS:${PN}-tests =+ "perl python3 bash"
 
 RSUGGESTS:${PN} += "${PN}-archive ${PN}-tests \
                     ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'perl', '${PN}-perl', '', d)} \