| Message ID | 20230324100059.59319-1-sdoshi@mvista.com |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [kirkstone] OpenSSL: Security fix for CVE-2023-0464 | expand |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 3:01 AM Siddharth <sdoshi@mvista.com> wrote: > From: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com> > > Upstream-Status: Backport from [ > https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 > ] > Rather than backport, we should instead upgrade to 3.0.9 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com> > --- > .../openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch | 226 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb | 1 + > 2 files changed, 227 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch > b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..69c7e2af67 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ > +From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org> > +Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 > +Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints > + > +A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions > +of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains > +that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this > +vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers > +exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service > +(DoS) attack on affected systems. > + > +Fixes CVE-2023-0464 > + > +Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> > +Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> > +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568) > + > +Upstream-Status: Backport from > +[ > https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 > ] > +CVE: CVE-2023-0464 > +Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com> > +--- > + crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- > + crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- > + crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > + 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > + > +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h > +index 18b53cc..cba107c 100644 > +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h > ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h > +@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { > + }; > + > + struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { > ++ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ > ++ size_t node_count; > ++ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ > ++ size_t node_maximum; > ++ > + /* This is the tree 'level' data */ > + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; > + int nlevel; > +@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE > *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, > + X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, > + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, > + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, > +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); > ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, > ++ int extra_data); > + void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); > + int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, > + const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const > ASN1_OBJECT *oid); > +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c > +index 9d9a7ea..450f95a 100644 > +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c > ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c > +@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const > X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, > + X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, > + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, > + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, > +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) > ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, > ++ int extra_data) > + { > + X509_POLICY_NODE *node; > + > ++ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates > CVE-2023-0464 */ > ++ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) > ++ return NULL; > ++ > + node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); > + if (node == NULL) { > + ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); > +@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE > *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, > + } > + node->data = data; > + node->parent = parent; > +- if (level) { > ++ if (level != NULL) { > + if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { > + if (level->anyPolicy) > + goto node_error; > +@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE > *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, > + } > + } > + > +- if (tree) { > ++ if (extra_data) { > + if (tree->extra_data == NULL) > + tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); > + if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ > +@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE > *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, > + } > + } > + > ++ tree->node_count++; > + if (parent) > + parent->nchild++; > + > +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c > +index fa45da5..f953a05 100644 > +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c > ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c > +@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ > + > + #include "pcy_local.h" > + > ++/* > ++ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set > it to > ++ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. > ++ * > ++ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which > opens the > ++ * door on CVE-2023-0464. > ++ */ > ++#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX > ++# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 > ++#endif > ++ > + static void expected_print(BIO *channel, > + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE > *node, > + int indent) > +@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, > STACK_OF(X509) *certs, > + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; > + } > + > ++ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ > ++ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; > ++ > + /* > + * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. > + * > +@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, > STACK_OF(X509) *certs, > + if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL, > + OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == > NULL) > + goto bad_tree; > +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { > ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { > + ossl_policy_data_free(data); > + goto bad_tree; > + } > +@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, > STACK_OF(X509) *certs, > + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise > + */ > + static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, > +- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) > ++ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, > ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) > + { > + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; > + int i, matched = 0; > +@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int > tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, > + X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, > i); > + > + if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { > +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == > NULL) > ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == > NULL) > + return 0; > + matched = 1; > + } > + } > + if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { > +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, > NULL) == NULL) > ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, > tree, 0) == NULL) > + return 0; > + } > + return 1; > +@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL > *curr, > + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. > + */ > + static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, > +- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) > ++ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, > ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) > + { > + int i; > + > +@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, > + X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, > i); > + > + /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ > +- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) > ++ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) > + return 0; > + } > + return 1; > +@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, > + /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ > + data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; > + data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; > +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { > ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { > + ossl_policy_data_free(data); > + return 0; > + } > +@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, > + /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ > + if (last->anyPolicy && > + ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, > +- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) > ++ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) > + return 0; > + return 1; > + } > +@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE > *tree, > + extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS > + | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; > + node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, > anyPolicy->parent, > +- tree); > ++ tree, 1); > + } > + if (!tree->user_policies) { > + tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); > +@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) > + > + for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { > + cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert); > +- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) > ++ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) > + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; > + > + if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) > +-- > +2.35.7 > + > diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb > b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb > index 75f9e44748..92e460b1ba 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ SRC_URI = " > http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-${PV}.tar.gz \ > > file://0001-buildinfo-strip-sysroot-and-debug-prefix-map-from-co.patch \ > file://afalg.patch \ > file://0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch \ > + file://CVE-2023-0464.patch \ > " > > SRC_URI:append:class-nativesdk = " \ > -- > 2.25.1 > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#179027): > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/179027 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97820339/924729 > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [ > ticotimo@gmail.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >
Hi Tim, > > Rather than backport, we should instead upgrade to 3.0.9 > https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 > - Yes, upgrade is the ideal scenario we would be looking at. Even as per openssl.org the issue is solved in 3.0.9, 1.1.1u and 3.1.1, but those versions of OpenSSL (3.0.9, 3.1.1, 1.1.1u) are still under development and not yet released. - I will definately be keeping an eye out for those versions to be released and submit the version up patches as soon as its released after checking API compatability(which I feel wont be an issue). - But, till the time those versions aren't released, this backport helps to patch of a known CVE and hence submitted it. Regards, Siddharth
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..69c7e2af67 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org> +Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 +Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints + +A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions +of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains +that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this +vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers +exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service +(DoS) attack on affected systems. + +Fixes CVE-2023-0464 + +Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> +Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568) + +Upstream-Status: Backport from +[https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1] +CVE: CVE-2023-0464 +Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com> +--- + crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- + crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- + crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- + 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h +index 18b53cc..cba107c 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h +@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { + }; + + struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { ++ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ ++ size_t node_count; ++ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ ++ size_t node_maximum; ++ + /* This is the tree 'level' data */ + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; + int nlevel; +@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, + X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, ++ int extra_data); + void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); + int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, + const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c +index 9d9a7ea..450f95a 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c +@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, ++ int extra_data) + { + X509_POLICY_NODE *node; + ++ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ ++ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) ++ return NULL; ++ + node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); + if (node == NULL) { + ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); +@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + node->data = data; + node->parent = parent; +- if (level) { ++ if (level != NULL) { + if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { + if (level->anyPolicy) + goto node_error; +@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + } + +- if (tree) { ++ if (extra_data) { + if (tree->extra_data == NULL) + tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); + if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ +@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + } + ++ tree->node_count++; + if (parent) + parent->nchild++; + +diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c +index fa45da5..f953a05 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c ++++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c +@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ + + #include "pcy_local.h" + ++/* ++ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to ++ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. ++ * ++ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the ++ * door on CVE-2023-0464. ++ */ ++#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX ++# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 ++#endif ++ + static void expected_print(BIO *channel, + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node, + int indent) +@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; + } + ++ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ ++ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; ++ + /* + * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. + * +@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL, + OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) + goto bad_tree; +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { + ossl_policy_data_free(data); + goto bad_tree; + } +@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise + */ + static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, +- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) ++ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + { + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; + int i, matched = 0; +@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); + + if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + matched = 1; + } + } + if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + } + return 1; +@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. + */ + static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, +- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) ++ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + { + int i; + +@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); + + /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ +- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) ++ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) + return 0; + } + return 1; +@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ + data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; + data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; +- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { ++ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { + ossl_policy_data_free(data); + return 0; + } +@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ + if (last->anyPolicy && + ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, +- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) ++ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + return 1; + } +@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, + extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS + | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; + node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, +- tree); ++ tree, 1); + } + if (!tree->user_policies) { + tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); +@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + + for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { + cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert); +- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) ++ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; + + if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) +-- +2.35.7 + diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb index 75f9e44748..92e460b1ba 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-${PV}.tar.gz \ file://0001-buildinfo-strip-sysroot-and-debug-prefix-map-from-co.patch \ file://afalg.patch \ file://0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch \ + file://CVE-2023-0464.patch \ " SRC_URI:append:class-nativesdk = " \