similarity index 73%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.6.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/erofs-utils_1.7.1.bb
@@ -5,11 +5,8 @@ SECTION = "base"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=73001d804ea1e3d84365f652242cca20"
HOMEPAGE = "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git/tree/README"
-SRCREV = "21710612d35cd952490959bfa6ea9fe87aaa52dd"
-SRC_URI = "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git;branch=master;protocol=https \
- file://0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch \
- file://0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch \
-"
+SRCREV = "83d94dc619075e71ca4d0f42941cfc18d269a2af"
+SRC_URI = "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git;branch=master;protocol=https"
UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P<pver>(\d+(\.\d+)+))"
deleted file mode 100644
@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
-From c769805c79d5acede65d96e5786aa5ebb46c01e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
-Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:05:19 +0800
-Subject: [PATCH 1/2] erofs-utils: fsck: don't allocate/read too large extents
-
-Since some crafted EROFS filesystem images could have insane large
-extents, which causes unexpected bahaviors when extracting data.
-
-Fix it by extracting large extents with a buffer of a reasonable
-maximum size limit and reading multiple times instead.
-
-Note that only `--extract` option is impacted.
-
-CVE: CVE-2023-33552
-Closes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33552
-Reported-by: Chaoming Yang <lometsj@live.com>
-Fixes: 412c8f908132 ("erofs-utils: fsck: add --extract=X support to extract to path X")
-Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230602030519.117071-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
----
- fsck/main.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
-index 6b42252..6689ad8 100644
---- a/fsck/main.c
-+++ b/fsck/main.c
-@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode *inode, int outfd)
- }
-
- while (pos < inode->i_size) {
-+ unsigned int alloc_rawsize;
-+
- map.m_la = pos;
- if (compressed)
- ret = z_erofs_map_blocks_iter(inode, &map,
-@@ -420,10 +422,28 @@ static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode *inode, int outfd)
- if (!(map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_MAPPED) || !fsckcfg.check_decomp)
- continue;
-
-- if (map.m_plen > raw_size) {
-- raw_size = map.m_plen;
-- raw = realloc(raw, raw_size);
-- BUG_ON(!raw);
-+ if (map.m_plen > Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_MAX_SIZE) {
-+ if (compressed) {
-+ erofs_err("invalid pcluster size %" PRIu64 " @ offset %" PRIu64 " of nid %" PRIu64,
-+ map.m_plen, map.m_la,
-+ inode->nid | 0ULL);
-+ ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
-+ goto out;
-+ }
-+ alloc_rawsize = Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_MAX_SIZE;
-+ } else {
-+ alloc_rawsize = map.m_plen;
-+ }
-+
-+ if (alloc_rawsize > raw_size) {
-+ char *newraw = realloc(raw, alloc_rawsize);
-+
-+ if (!newraw) {
-+ ret = -ENOMEM;
-+ goto out;
-+ }
-+ raw = newraw;
-+ raw_size = alloc_rawsize;
- }
-
- if (compressed) {
-@@ -434,18 +454,27 @@ static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode *inode, int outfd)
- }
- ret = z_erofs_read_one_data(inode, &map, raw, buffer,
- 0, map.m_llen, false);
-+ if (ret)
-+ goto out;
-+
-+ if (outfd >= 0 && write(outfd, buffer, map.m_llen) < 0)
-+ goto fail_eio;
- } else {
-- ret = erofs_read_one_data(&map, raw, 0, map.m_plen);
-- }
-- if (ret)
-- goto out;
-+ u64 p = 0;
-
-- if (outfd >= 0 && write(outfd, compressed ? buffer : raw,
-- map.m_llen) < 0) {
-- erofs_err("I/O error occurred when verifying data chunk @ nid %llu",
-- inode->nid | 0ULL);
-- ret = -EIO;
-- goto out;
-+ do {
-+ u64 count = min_t(u64, alloc_rawsize,
-+ map.m_llen);
-+
-+ ret = erofs_read_one_data(&map, raw, p, count);
-+ if (ret)
-+ goto out;
-+
-+ if (outfd >= 0 && write(outfd, raw, count) < 0)
-+ goto fail_eio;
-+ map.m_llen -= count;
-+ p += count;
-+ } while (map.m_llen);
- }
- }
-
-@@ -460,6 +489,12 @@ out:
- if (buffer)
- free(buffer);
- return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
-+
-+fail_eio:
-+ erofs_err("I/O error occurred when verifying data chunk @ nid %llu",
-+ inode->nid | 0ULL);
-+ ret = -EIO;
-+ goto out;
- }
-
- static inline int erofs_extract_dir(struct erofs_inode *inode)
-2.34.1
-
deleted file mode 100644
@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
-From 6cebfbb79b1d5d8feb48801e1008eea5bfa8b599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
-Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:52:56 +0800
-Subject: [PATCH 2/2] erofs-utils: fsck: block insane long paths when
- extracting images
-
-Since some crafted EROFS filesystem images could have insane deep
-hierarchy (or may form directory loops) which triggers the
-PATH_MAX-sized path buffer OR stack overflow.
-
-Actually some crafted images cannot be deemed as real corrupted
-images but over-PATH_MAX paths are not something that we'd like to
-support for now.
-
-CVE: CVE-2023-33551
-Closes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33551
-Reported-by: Chaoming Yang <lometsj@live.com>
-Fixes: f44043561491 ("erofs-utils: introduce fsck.erofs")
-Fixes: b11f84f593f9 ("erofs-utils: fsck: convert to use erofs_iterate_dir()")
-Fixes: 412c8f908132 ("erofs-utils: fsck: add --extract=X support to extract to path X")
-Signeo-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230602055256.18061-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
----
- fsck/main.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
-index 6689ad8..28d95ec 100644
---- a/fsck/main.c
-+++ b/fsck/main.c
-@@ -680,28 +680,35 @@ again:
- static int erofsfsck_dirent_iter(struct erofs_dir_context *ctx)
- {
- int ret;
-- size_t prev_pos = fsckcfg.extract_pos;
-+ size_t prev_pos, curr_pos;
-
- if (ctx->dot_dotdot)
- return 0;
-
-- if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
-- size_t curr_pos = prev_pos;
-+ prev_pos = fsckcfg.extract_pos;
-+ curr_pos = prev_pos;
-+
-+ if (prev_pos + ctx->de_namelen >= PATH_MAX) {
-+ erofs_err("unable to fsck since the path is too long (%u)",
-+ curr_pos + ctx->de_namelen);
-+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-+ }
-
-+ if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
- fsckcfg.extract_path[curr_pos++] = '/';
- strncpy(fsckcfg.extract_path + curr_pos, ctx->dname,
- ctx->de_namelen);
- curr_pos += ctx->de_namelen;
- fsckcfg.extract_path[curr_pos] = '\0';
-- fsckcfg.extract_pos = curr_pos;
-+ } else {
-+ curr_pos += ctx->de_namelen;
- }
--
-+ fsckcfg.extract_pos = curr_pos;
- ret = erofsfsck_check_inode(ctx->dir->nid, ctx->de_nid);
-
-- if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
-+ if (fsckcfg.extract_path)
- fsckcfg.extract_path[prev_pos] = '\0';
-- fsckcfg.extract_pos = prev_pos;
-- }
-+ fsckcfg.extract_pos = prev_pos;
- return ret;
- }
-
-2.34.1
-
Hello, this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *erofs-utils* to *1.7.1* has Failed(do_compile). Detailed error information: do_compile failed Next steps: - apply the patch: git am 0001-erofs-utils-upgrade-1.6-1.7.1.patch - check the changes to upstream patches and summarize them in the commit message, - compile an image that contains the package - perform some basic sanity tests - amend the patch and sign it off: git commit -s --reset-author --amend - send it to the appropriate mailing list Alternatively, if you believe the recipe should not be upgraded at this time, you can fill RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON in respective recipe file so that automatic upgrades would no longer be attempted. Please review the attached files for further information and build/update failures. Any problem please file a bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Automated%20Update%20Handler Regards, The Upgrade Helper -- >8 -- From 4f0b7744fee5f8a1004f348ce7c4e896f7d76efe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Upgrade Helper <auh@yoctoproject.org> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 06:27:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] erofs-utils: upgrade 1.6 -> 1.7.1 --- ...rofs-utils_1.6.bb => erofs-utils_1.7.1.bb} | 7 +- ...-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch | 126 ------------------ ...-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch | 80 ----------- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/{erofs-utils_1.6.bb => erofs-utils_1.7.1.bb} (73%) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0001-erofs-utils-fsck-don-t-allocate-read-too-large-exten.patch delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/erofs-utils/files/0002-erofs-utils-fsck-block-insane-long-paths-when-extrac.patch