mbox series

[v4,00/10] Add SPDX 3.0 support

Message ID 20240624193151.1645802-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com
Headers show
Series Add SPDX 3.0 support | expand

Message

Joshua Watt June 24, 2024, 7:10 p.m. UTC
This patch series add support for SPDX 3.0 and sets it as the default.
Currently it is not possible to have SPDX 2.2 and SPDX 3.0 enabled at
the same time

v2: Added tests and addressed feedback
v3: Fixed several oe-selftest and build failures
v4: Fixed silly typo mistake in staging.bbclass

Joshua Watt (10):
  classes-recipe/image: Add image file manifest
  classes-recipe/baremetal-image: Add image file manifest
  classes/create-spdx-3.0: Add classes
  classes-global/staging: Exclude do_create_spdx from automatic sysroot
    extension
  binutils-cross-testsuite: Rename to binutils-testsuite
  classes-recipe/image_types: Add SPDX_IMAGE_PURPOSE to images
  selftest: spdx: Add SPDX 3.0 test cases
  classes-recipe: nospdx: Add class
  classes/spdx-common: Move SPDX_SUPPLIER
  Switch default spdx version to 3.0

 meta/classes-global/mirrors.bbclass           |    2 +-
 meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass           |    9 +-
 meta/classes-recipe/baremetal-image.bbclass   |   30 +-
 meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass             |   58 +
 meta/classes-recipe/image_types.bbclass       |    2 +
 meta/classes-recipe/image_types_wic.bbclass   |    1 +
 meta/classes-recipe/nospdx.bbclass            |   13 +
 meta/classes-recipe/packagegroup.bbclass      |    2 +
 meta/classes/create-spdx-2.2.bbclass          |    8 +
 meta/classes/create-spdx-3.0.bbclass          | 1179 ++++
 meta/classes/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass    |  224 +
 meta/classes/create-spdx.bbclass              |    2 +-
 meta/classes/spdx-common.bbclass              |   13 +-
 meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc      |    2 +-
 meta/lib/oe/sbom30.py                         | 1122 +++
 meta/lib/oe/spdx30.py                         | 5996 +++++++++++++++++
 meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/binutils.py      |    2 +-
 meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/spdx.py          |  119 +-
 meta/recipes-core/meta/build-sysroots.bb      |    5 +-
 meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-world-pkgdata.bb  |    3 +-
 ...ite_2.42.bb => binutils-testsuite_2.42.bb} |    3 +
 21 files changed, 8765 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/classes-recipe/nospdx.bbclass
 create mode 100644 meta/classes/create-spdx-3.0.bbclass
 create mode 100644 meta/classes/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass
 create mode 100644 meta/lib/oe/sbom30.py
 create mode 100644 meta/lib/oe/spdx30.py
 rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-cross-testsuite_2.42.bb => binutils-testsuite_2.42.bb} (95%)

Comments

Alexandre Belloni June 25, 2024, 3:08 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello,

I believe this is the cause of the following failures:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/4986/steps/12/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/4989/steps/13/logs/stdio

I'm not sure why they don't have any diffoscope output.

On 24/06/2024 13:10:50-0600, Joshua Watt wrote:
> This patch series add support for SPDX 3.0 and sets it as the default.
> Currently it is not possible to have SPDX 2.2 and SPDX 3.0 enabled at
> the same time
> 
> v2: Added tests and addressed feedback
> v3: Fixed several oe-selftest and build failures
> v4: Fixed silly typo mistake in staging.bbclass
> 
> Joshua Watt (10):
>   classes-recipe/image: Add image file manifest
>   classes-recipe/baremetal-image: Add image file manifest
>   classes/create-spdx-3.0: Add classes
>   classes-global/staging: Exclude do_create_spdx from automatic sysroot
>     extension
>   binutils-cross-testsuite: Rename to binutils-testsuite
>   classes-recipe/image_types: Add SPDX_IMAGE_PURPOSE to images
>   selftest: spdx: Add SPDX 3.0 test cases
>   classes-recipe: nospdx: Add class
>   classes/spdx-common: Move SPDX_SUPPLIER
>   Switch default spdx version to 3.0
> 
>  meta/classes-global/mirrors.bbclass           |    2 +-
>  meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass           |    9 +-
>  meta/classes-recipe/baremetal-image.bbclass   |   30 +-
>  meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass             |   58 +
>  meta/classes-recipe/image_types.bbclass       |    2 +
>  meta/classes-recipe/image_types_wic.bbclass   |    1 +
>  meta/classes-recipe/nospdx.bbclass            |   13 +
>  meta/classes-recipe/packagegroup.bbclass      |    2 +
>  meta/classes/create-spdx-2.2.bbclass          |    8 +
>  meta/classes/create-spdx-3.0.bbclass          | 1179 ++++
>  meta/classes/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass    |  224 +
>  meta/classes/create-spdx.bbclass              |    2 +-
>  meta/classes/spdx-common.bbclass              |   13 +-
>  meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc      |    2 +-
>  meta/lib/oe/sbom30.py                         | 1122 +++
>  meta/lib/oe/spdx30.py                         | 5996 +++++++++++++++++
>  meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/binutils.py      |    2 +-
>  meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/spdx.py          |  119 +-
>  meta/recipes-core/meta/build-sysroots.bb      |    5 +-
>  meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-world-pkgdata.bb  |    3 +-
>  ...ite_2.42.bb => binutils-testsuite_2.42.bb} |    3 +
>  21 files changed, 8765 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/classes-recipe/nospdx.bbclass
>  create mode 100644 meta/classes/create-spdx-3.0.bbclass
>  create mode 100644 meta/classes/create-spdx-image-3.0.bbclass
>  create mode 100644 meta/lib/oe/sbom30.py
>  create mode 100644 meta/lib/oe/spdx30.py
>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-cross-testsuite_2.42.bb => binutils-testsuite_2.42.bb} (95%)
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.2
> 

> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#201102): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/201102
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106856868/3617179
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
Richard Purdie June 25, 2024, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 17:08 +0200, Alexandre Belloni via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I believe this is the cause of the following failures:
> 
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/4986/steps/12/logs/stdio
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/4989/steps/13/logs/stdio
> 
> I'm not sure why they don't have any diffoscope output.

"The following rpm packages are missing and not in exclusion list:"

there is no diffoscope as they don't exist at all.

I suspect a cleandirs corrupted the build by deleting things before
they were added to the sstate output.

Cheers,

Richard