Message ID | 20240610214456.2757397-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add SPDX 3.0 support | expand |
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 15:41 -0600, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > This patch series add support for SPDX 3.0. Currently it is not possible > to have SPDX 2.2 and SPDX 3.0 enabled at the same time; users may choose > to specifically use SPDX 3.0 instead of 2.2 by doing INHERIT += > "create-spdx-3.0" > > The default version is not changed yet, although that will likely happen > soon Does this series depend on other patches? Cheers, Richard
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 15:41 -0600, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > This patch series add support for SPDX 3.0. Currently it is not > possible > to have SPDX 2.2 and SPDX 3.0 enabled at the same time; users may > choose > to specifically use SPDX 3.0 instead of 2.2 by doing INHERIT += > "create-spdx-3.0" > > The default version is not changed yet, although that will likely > happen > soon > > Joshua Watt (6): > classes-recipe/image: Add image file manifest > classes/spdx-common: Move common SPDX to new class > classes/spdx-common: Add SPDX version to path > classes/spdx-common: Return empty list from extract_licenses > classes/create-spdx-3.0: Add class > classes-recipe/image_types: Add SPDX_IMAGE_PURPOSE to images I set 3.0 to the default for testing and there were some interesting looking failures: https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/43/builds/52/steps/11/logs/stdio I'm guessing: https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/37/builds/60 is due to a missing patch? Other failures: https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/74/builds/44/steps/13/logs/stdio https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/93/builds/51/steps/11/logs/stdio but I stopped the build at this point. Cheers, Richard
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 4:40 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 15:41 -0600, Joshua Watt via > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > This patch series add support for SPDX 3.0. Currently it is not > > possible > > to have SPDX 2.2 and SPDX 3.0 enabled at the same time; users may > > choose > > to specifically use SPDX 3.0 instead of 2.2 by doing INHERIT += > > "create-spdx-3.0" > > > > The default version is not changed yet, although that will likely > > happen > > soon > > > > Joshua Watt (6): > > classes-recipe/image: Add image file manifest > > classes/spdx-common: Move common SPDX to new class > > classes/spdx-common: Add SPDX version to path > > classes/spdx-common: Return empty list from extract_licenses > > classes/create-spdx-3.0: Add class > > classes-recipe/image_types: Add SPDX_IMAGE_PURPOSE to images > > I set 3.0 to the default for testing and there were some interesting > looking failures: > > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/43/builds/52/steps/11/logs/stdio > > I'm guessing: > > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/37/builds/60 > > is due to a missing patch? Hah, I don't think so, I just neglected to test SDK builds. My bad. > > Other failures: > > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/74/builds/44/steps/13/logs/stdio > https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/93/builds/51/steps/11/logs/stdio That one appears to be some corner case I need to figure out. > > but I stopped the build at this point. Thanks > > Cheers, > > Richard