Message ID | 20240512063159.1249522-1-johannes.schneider@leica-geosystems.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | pkg-database and systemd-sysext image | expand |
Hello, It seems that this reliably fails oe-selftest-armhost. I didn't really pay attention until now beause we had other issues but in this build, those are the only failing tests: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/127/builds/3322/steps/15/logs/stdio On 12/05/2024 08:31:56+0200, Johannes Schneider via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > systemd-sysext allows to overlay another image (or multiple) ontop of > a "base-image" = the current rootfs, via the use of overlayfs; to add > tools and features meant for development purposes. > > To quote the documentation on systemd-sysext: > " ...addition in order to make debugging/development easier). System > extension images should not be misunderstood as a generic software > packaging framework, ..." > > To build a lean image, that only holds packages that are not already > part of the base-image, a snapshot of the package-database is taken > after the installation of the base-rootfs is done, and picked up again > when collecting the rootfs of such a extension image. > > with all this in place an example usage could look like this: > some-core-image.bb > inherit core-image > IMAGE_GEN_PKGDBFS = "1" > > extending-image.bb > inherit image-sysext > IMAGE_FSTYPES = "squashfs" > IMAGE_BASE_PKGDB = "some-core-image" > # the above pointing at a package-db similar to: > # build/deploy/images/$MACHINE/some-core-image-$MACHINE-20240210172305-pkgdb.rootfs.tar.gz > > then on the device, running some-core-image, with the extension image placed at FN: > $> ln -s "$FN" /run/extensions/$(basename $FN).raw > $> systemd-sysext list > $> SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug systemd-sysext merge > > As long as the VERSION_ID of the extension image matches the os-release > in the base image, the above commands return sucessfully; > for details on the compativility check see the docs for systemd-sysext. > > ========= > > changes with v2: > rebase from 'kirkstone' onto 'master' > > changes with v3: > incorporate review suggestions for simplification > add task dependency handling > add oe-selftest for the pkgdb handling > add variable documentation and > some more comments, and examples in the commit-msg > > changes with v4: > rebase onto 'master' => no functional changes > fixed patchtest findings > > changes with v5: > rebase onto 'master' > add '.sysext' to the deployed symlink name > sidenote on the tests and autobuilder failure: run locally they succeed, e.g.: > #> oe-selftest --verbose -r imagefeatures.ImageFeatures.test_image_gen_pkgdbfs > > changes with v6: > tests: restructure to call 'bitbake' only once in the testcase itself > (in hopes of solving the autobuilder problem; local test runs succeed) > > changes with v7: > tests: undo the restructuring of done in v6, in favour of explicitly forcing steps: > '-c rootfs -f'. since concurrency of the autobuilder, and reusing artifacts/sstate-caching is probably the issue? > > changes with v8: > tests: fixed missing feature=PACKAGE_CLASSES during 'test_image_gen_pkgdbfs' > which is now split into three, one for each of the three available packagemanager: ipk, deb, rpm > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#199209): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/199209 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106051545/3617179 > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
Hoi Alexandre, and thanks again for patiently pointing out the autobuilder problems :-) "only" the test_image_gen_pkgdbfs_{ipk,deb,rpm} fail, the test_image_use_pkgdbfs succeeds picking apart the yocto-autobuilder-helper/config.json showed the difference: basically all oe-selftest-* use "MACHINE" : "qemux86-64" **but** oe-selftest-armhost sets: "MACHINE": "qemuarm64" the test_image_gen_pkgdbfs_ checks to sanity check the packagamanager state looked for a "kernel-image" package in the listing... but for quemuarm64 "packagegroup-core-boot" replaces that v9 of the patchstack adapts that particular assert(s) to look for either the kernel-image or core-boot depending on the set MACHINE gruß Johannes