Message ID | 20220310131329.1906537-1-ch@denx.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Patches and bugfixes for overlayfs | expand |
On 10.03.2022 14:13, Claudius Heine wrote: > Hi, > > I bundled my patches to overlayfs and overlayfs-etc togehter in this > patchset and fixed the whitespace issues. > > regards, > Claudius > > -- > Changes from v1: > - fixed whitespace issues: converted tabs to 4 spaces. > - changed git commit title of patch 4 > > Claudius Heine (4): > overlayfs-etc: add condition to package-management feature conflict > overlayfs: add systemd unit path prefix to FILES:${PN} array > files: overlayfs-etc: wrap long lines of preinit file > files: overlayfs-etc: add overlay mount options to preinit > > meta/classes/overlayfs-etc.bbclass | 3 ++- > meta/classes/overlayfs.bbclass | 3 ++- > meta/files/overlayfs-etc-preinit.sh.in | 12 ++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Hi Claudius, Thanks for the patches. It seems like the first 2 are already in master branch or I'm missing something? Cheers, Vyacheslav
Hi Vyacheslav, On 2022-03-10 15:28, Vyacheslav Yurkov wrote: > On 10.03.2022 14:13, Claudius Heine wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I bundled my patches to overlayfs and overlayfs-etc togehter in this >> patchset and fixed the whitespace issues. >> >> regards, >> Claudius >> >> -- >> Changes from v1: >> - fixed whitespace issues: converted tabs to 4 spaces. >> - changed git commit title of patch 4 >> >> Claudius Heine (4): >> overlayfs-etc: add condition to package-management feature conflict >> overlayfs: add systemd unit path prefix to FILES:${PN} array >> files: overlayfs-etc: wrap long lines of preinit file >> files: overlayfs-etc: add overlay mount options to preinit >> >> meta/classes/overlayfs-etc.bbclass | 3 ++- >> meta/classes/overlayfs.bbclass | 3 ++- >> meta/files/overlayfs-etc-preinit.sh.in | 12 ++++++++++-- >> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > > Hi Claudius, > Thanks for the patches. It seems like the first 2 are already in master > branch or I'm missing something? Yes, that seems to be the case, I missed that. There are only non-essential white space differences between those and mine, so my first two patches can be ignored. Thanks for spotting that. regards, Claudius