[11/30] manuals: add references to the "do_patch" task

diff --git a/documentation/dev-manual/common-tasks.rst b/documentation/dev-manual/common-tasks.rst
index 74b050f600..947e10560a 100644
--- a/documentation/dev-manual/common-tasks.rst
+++ b/documentation/dev-manual/common-tasks.rst
@@ -9633,7 +9633,7 @@  Running Specific Tasks
 ----------------------
 
 Any given recipe consists of a set of tasks. The standard BitBake
-behavior in most cases is: :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, ``do_patch``,
+behavior in most cases is: :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, :ref:`ref-tasks-patch`,
 :ref:`ref-tasks-configure`, :ref:`ref-tasks-compile`, :ref:`ref-tasks-install`, :ref:`ref-tasks-package`,
 ``do_package_write_*``, and :ref:`ref-tasks-build`. The default task is
 :ref:`ref-tasks-build` and any tasks on which it depends build first. Some tasks,
diff --git a/documentation/migration-guides/migration-1.3.rst b/documentation/migration-guides/migration-1.3.rst
index 6a1755d1dc..09fc39d3ca 100644
--- a/documentation/migration-guides/migration-1.3.rst
+++ b/documentation/migration-guides/migration-1.3.rst
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@  Previously, an inconsistent mix of spaces and tabs existed, which made
 extending these functions using ``_append`` or ``_prepend`` complicated
 given that Python treats whitespace as syntactically significant. If you
 are defining or extending any Python functions (e.g.
-``populate_packages``, ``do_unpack``, ``do_patch`` and so forth) in
+``populate_packages``, ``do_unpack``, :ref:`ref-tasks-patch` and so forth) in
 custom recipes or classes, you need to ensure you are using consistent
 four-space indentation.
 
diff --git a/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst b/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst
index 36498ba1e1..f1457522da 100644
--- a/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst
+++ b/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@  end result.
 The build system has knowledge of the relationship between these tasks
 and other preceding tasks. For example, if BitBake runs
 ``do_populate_sysroot_setscene`` for something, it does not make sense
-to run any of the :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, ``do_patch``,
+to run any of the :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, :ref:`ref-tasks-patch`,
 :ref:`ref-tasks-configure`, :ref:`ref-tasks-compile`, and :ref:`ref-tasks-install` tasks. However, if
 :ref:`ref-tasks-package` needs to be run, BitBake needs to run those other tasks.
 
diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/qa-checks.rst b/documentation/ref-manual/qa-checks.rst
index ff8916aedf..9455bec3fd 100644
--- a/documentation/ref-manual/qa-checks.rst
+++ b/documentation/ref-manual/qa-checks.rst
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@  Errors and Warnings
 
 - ``Fuzz detected: <patch output> [patch-fuzz]``
 
-    This check looks for evidence of "fuzz" when applying patches within the ``do_patch``
+    This check looks for evidence of "fuzz" when applying patches within the :ref:`ref-tasks-patch`
     task. Patch fuzz is a situation when the ``patch`` tool ignores some of the context
     lines in order to apply the patch. Consider this example:
 
diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/tasks.rst b/documentation/ref-manual/tasks.rst
index 1bb8bc1918..f0129c1f72 100644
--- a/documentation/ref-manual/tasks.rst
+++ b/documentation/ref-manual/tasks.rst
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@  file as a patch file::
        "
 
 Conversely, if you have a file whose file type is ``.patch`` or ``.diff``
-and you want to exclude it so that the ``do_patch`` task does not apply
+and you want to exclude it so that the :ref:`ref-tasks-patch` task does not apply
 it during the patch phase, you can use the "apply=no" parameter with the
 :term:`SRC_URI` statement::