diff mbox series

[kirkstone] poky.conf: update SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to match autobuilder

Message ID 20231220152600.282677-1-michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [kirkstone] poky.conf: update SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to match autobuilder | expand

Commit Message

Michael Opdenacker Dec. 20, 2023, 3:26 p.m. UTC
From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>

From the intersection of the list of allowed workers
on https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2/tree/config.py
and the active workers on
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/workers

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
---
 meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Richard Purdie Dec. 20, 2023, 11:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 16:26 +0100, Michael Opdenacker via
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
> 
> From the intersection of the list of allowed workers
> on https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2/tree/config.py
> and the active workers on
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/workers
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
> index c179cbf..f5aff32 100644
> --- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
> +++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
> @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@ SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \
>              ubuntu-18.04 \n \
>              ubuntu-20.04 \n \
>              ubuntu-22.04 \n \
> -            fedora-37 \n \
> +            fedora-38 \n \
>              debian-11 \n \
> -            opensuseleap-15.3 \n \
>              almalinux-8.8 \n \
>              "
>  # add poky sanity bbclass


I believe the convention for older releases should be to leave releases
we tested upon at the time of the original release but add new ones
we've started testing.

It is unlikely Fedora 37 would stop working with the LTS even if we no
longer test there.

Cheers,

Richard
Michael Opdenacker Dec. 21, 2023, 10:41 a.m. UTC | #2
On 21.12.23 at 00:31, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 16:26 +0100, Michael Opdenacker via
> lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
>>
>>  From the intersection of the list of allowed workers
>> on https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2/tree/config.py
>> and the active workers on
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/workers
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>   meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 3 +--
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
>> index c179cbf..f5aff32 100644
>> --- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
>> +++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
>> @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@ SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \
>>               ubuntu-18.04 \n \
>>               ubuntu-20.04 \n \
>>               ubuntu-22.04 \n \
>> -            fedora-37 \n \
>> +            fedora-38 \n \
>>               debian-11 \n \
>> -            opensuseleap-15.3 \n \
>>               almalinux-8.8 \n \
>>               "
>>   # add poky sanity bbclass
>
> I believe the convention for older releases should be to leave releases
> we tested upon at the time of the original release but add new ones
> we've started testing.
>
> It is unlikely Fedora 37 would stop working with the LTS even if we no
> longer test there.

Understood and remembered now, thanks!
I'll update my patches then.

However, my plan is to propose a documentation patch that removes Fedora 
37 from the distributions we support. Even if we can go on testing old 
distributions for several reasons (such Ubuntu 16.04 for quite long 
after it was EOLed), it's hard to support distributions for which we 
don't receive updates yet.

Thanks again!
Michael.
Richard Purdie Dec. 21, 2023, 10:45 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 11:41 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> On 21.12.23 at 00:31, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 16:26 +0100, Michael Opdenacker via
> > lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> > > From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
> > > 
> > >  From the intersection of the list of allowed workers
> > > on https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2/tree/config.py
> > > and the active workers on
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/workers
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
> > > ---
> > >   meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 3 +--
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
> > > index c179cbf..f5aff32 100644
> > > --- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
> > > +++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
> > > @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@ SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \
> > >               ubuntu-18.04 \n \
> > >               ubuntu-20.04 \n \
> > >               ubuntu-22.04 \n \
> > > -            fedora-37 \n \
> > > +            fedora-38 \n \
> > >               debian-11 \n \
> > > -            opensuseleap-15.3 \n \
> > >               almalinux-8.8 \n \
> > >               "
> > >   # add poky sanity bbclass
> > 
> > I believe the convention for older releases should be to leave releases
> > we tested upon at the time of the original release but add new ones
> > we've started testing.
> > 
> > It is unlikely Fedora 37 would stop working with the LTS even if we no
> > longer test there.
> 
> Understood and remembered now, thanks!
> I'll update my patches then.
> 
> However, my plan is to propose a documentation patch that removes Fedora 
> 37 from the distributions we support. Even if we can go on testing old 
> distributions for several reasons (such Ubuntu 16.04 for quite long 
> after it was EOLed), it's hard to support distributions for which we 
> don't receive updates yet.

I'd prefer to keep the list including the list of things tested when we
originally released even if they have passed EoL.

The reason why is that people quite likely do keep some of these
systems around and run the stable release updates on them. If they do,
they're going to get a message saying it is no longer supported. That
is true to some extent but things will continue to work and I'd rather
not "panic" them like that. Whether they should build on EoL systems is
a matter of debate and their choice, not ours.

Cheers,

Richard
Michael Opdenacker Dec. 21, 2023, 10:55 a.m. UTC | #4
On 21.12.23 at 11:45, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 11:41 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>> On 21.12.23 at 00:31, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 16:26 +0100, Michael Opdenacker via
>>> lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>>>> From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
>>>>
>>>>   From the intersection of the list of allowed workers
>>>> on https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2/tree/config.py
>>>> and the active workers on
>>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/workers
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 3 +--
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
>>>> index c179cbf..f5aff32 100644
>>>> --- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
>>>> +++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
>>>> @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@ SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \
>>>>                ubuntu-18.04 \n \
>>>>                ubuntu-20.04 \n \
>>>>                ubuntu-22.04 \n \
>>>> -            fedora-37 \n \
>>>> +            fedora-38 \n \
>>>>                debian-11 \n \
>>>> -            opensuseleap-15.3 \n \
>>>>                almalinux-8.8 \n \
>>>>                "
>>>>    # add poky sanity bbclass
>>> I believe the convention for older releases should be to leave releases
>>> we tested upon at the time of the original release but add new ones
>>> we've started testing.
>>>
>>> It is unlikely Fedora 37 would stop working with the LTS even if we no
>>> longer test there.
>> Understood and remembered now, thanks!
>> I'll update my patches then.
>>
>> However, my plan is to propose a documentation patch that removes Fedora
>> 37 from the distributions we support. Even if we can go on testing old
>> distributions for several reasons (such Ubuntu 16.04 for quite long
>> after it was EOLed), it's hard to support distributions for which we
>> don't receive updates yet.
> I'd prefer to keep the list including the list of things tested when we
> originally released even if they have passed EoL.
>
> The reason why is that people quite likely do keep some of these
> systems around and run the stable release updates on them. If they do,
> they're going to get a message saying it is no longer supported. That
> is true to some extent but things will continue to work and I'd rather
> not "panic" them like that. Whether they should build on EoL systems is
> a matter of debate and their choice, not ours.


This makes perfect sense. Actually, that's what we're actually doing but 
I forgot, not doing this frequently enough:
https://docs.yoctoproject.org/ref-manual/system-requirements.html#supported-linux-distributions

Apologies! That's why I should have more notes for such things.

Thanks
Michael.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
index c179cbf..f5aff32 100644
--- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
+++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf
@@ -37,9 +37,8 @@  SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \
             ubuntu-18.04 \n \
             ubuntu-20.04 \n \
             ubuntu-22.04 \n \
-            fedora-37 \n \
+            fedora-38 \n \
             debian-11 \n \
-            opensuseleap-15.3 \n \
             almalinux-8.8 \n \
             "
 # add poky sanity bbclass