diff mbox series

libc-headers: update to v6.15

Message ID 20250710153542.1196388-1-bruce.ashfield@gmail.com
State Accepted, archived
Commit cf89a121f93e404485983b92abc88a46a7f24890
Headers show
Series libc-headers: update to v6.15 | expand

Commit Message

Bruce Ashfield July 10, 2025, 3:35 p.m. UTC
From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>

kernel 6.15+ will be our next reference point, so we bump the libc
headers to match.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
---

Richard,

I'll be following this with our new reference kernel in the next
few days. But I was able to build all arches with glibc and muslc
with this bump.

I didn't see any fallout from packages that normally have to be
tweaked when I bump tht headers.

If we are lucky, this is a seamless update (one of the few), but
either way, it needs some wider AB testing.

If I go to 6.16 for the release / reference kernel, I'll bump once
more, but again, either way it is good to have some valid points
along the way to our final libc-headers version.

Bruce

 .../{linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb => linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb}  | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 rename meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/{linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb => linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb} (80%)

Comments

Khem Raj July 10, 2025, 10:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 8:35 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org
<bruce.ashfield=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:

> From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
>
> kernel 6.15+ will be our next reference point, so we bump the libc
> headers to match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Richard,
>
> I'll be following this with our new reference kernel in the next
> few days. But I was able to build all arches with glibc and muslc
> with this bump.
>
> I didn't see any fallout from packages that normally have to be
> tweaked when I bump tht headers.
>
> If we are lucky, this is a seamless update (one of the few), but
> either way, it needs some wider AB testing.
>
> If I go to 6.16 for the release / reference kernel, I'll bump once
> more, but again, either way it is good to have some valid points
> along the way to our final libc-headers version.
>

Ideally this should go with or after the kernel switch


> Bruce
>
>  .../{linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb => linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb}  | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  rename meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/{linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
> => linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb} (80%)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
> linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
> linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
> similarity index 80%
> rename from meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
> linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
> rename to meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
> linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
> index dd6add38de..70d2fd80ee 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
> @@ -8,5 +8,5 @@ SRC_URI:append:libc-musl = "\
>
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6bc538ed5bd9a7fc9398086aedcd7e46"
>
> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "b1a2562be56e42afb3f8489d4c2a7ac472ac23098f1ef1c1e40da601f54625eb"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "7586962547803be7ecc4056efc927fb25214548722bd28171172f3599abb9764"
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#220125):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/220125
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/114084659/1997914
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> raj.khem@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
Bruce Ashfield July 11, 2025, 2:52 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 6:24 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 8:35 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org
> <bruce.ashfield=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
>>
>> kernel 6.15+ will be our next reference point, so we bump the libc
>> headers to match.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> I'll be following this with our new reference kernel in the next
>> few days. But I was able to build all arches with glibc and muslc
>> with this bump.
>>
>> I didn't see any fallout from packages that normally have to be
>> tweaked when I bump tht headers.
>>
>> If we are lucky, this is a seamless update (one of the few), but
>> either way, it needs some wider AB testing.
>>
>> If I go to 6.16 for the release / reference kernel, I'll bump once
>> more, but again, either way it is good to have some valid points
>> along the way to our final libc-headers version.
>>
>
> Ideally this should go with or after the kernel switch
>

Ideally, maybe, but there's no reason to hold to that, there are some
really rare
issues this could cause, but none that we've ever seen in practice. As we
all know, we have many instances of our headers being newer than kernels
in our releases.

We've done this several times in the past decade, and it makes less of a
"big
bang" of both userspace and kernel debugging at once. We won't ship like
this, since the next reference will likely be 6.16

Either way, I'll leave it up to Richard.

Bruce



>
>
>> Bruce
>>
>>  .../{linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb => linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb}  | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  rename meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/{
>> linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb => linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb} (80%)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
>> linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
>> linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
>> similarity index 80%
>> rename from meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
>> linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
>> rename to meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/
>> linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
>> index dd6add38de..70d2fd80ee 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
>> @@ -8,5 +8,5 @@ SRC_URI:append:libc-musl = "\
>>
>>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6bc538ed5bd9a7fc9398086aedcd7e46"
>>
>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
>> "b1a2562be56e42afb3f8489d4c2a7ac472ac23098f1ef1c1e40da601f54625eb"
>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
>> "7586962547803be7ecc4056efc927fb25214548722bd28171172f3599abb9764"
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> View/Reply Online (#220125):
>> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/220125
>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/114084659/1997914
>> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
>> raj.khem@gmail.com]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
similarity index 80%
rename from meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
rename to meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
index dd6add38de..70d2fd80ee 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.12.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_6.15.bb
@@ -8,5 +8,5 @@  SRC_URI:append:libc-musl = "\
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6bc538ed5bd9a7fc9398086aedcd7e46"
 
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "b1a2562be56e42afb3f8489d4c2a7ac472ac23098f1ef1c1e40da601f54625eb"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "7586962547803be7ecc4056efc927fb25214548722bd28171172f3599abb9764"