Message ID | 20250521162632.27169-1-reatmon@ti.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Commit | 2dc0664e966cd8d4c99798cc997c192785773e31 |
Headers | show |
Series | sbc: Fix for gcc 15 compile error | expand |
Hi Ryan, On 2025-05-21 12:26 p.m., Ryan Eatmon via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. Do you mean *now*generating a compile error? I guess the YP AB doesn't have a build that catches this target. > > ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: > error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; > expected 0, have 3 > > Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new > error. It would be better to file a bug or at least send the maintainer a patch or a bug description. That's: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> from: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/bluetooth/sbc.git/tree/README Anyway, we do have 17 other such work-arounds: poky.git ❯ rg gnu17 | wc -l 17 so one more won't hurt that much! ../Randy > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon<reatmon@ti.com> > --- > meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 > > inherit autotools pkgconfig > > +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" > + > PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" > FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*" > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#217048):https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/217048 > Mute This Topic:https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/113232263/3616765 > Group Owner:openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > Unsubscribe:https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [randy.macleod@windriver.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
On 5/21/2025 11:55 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On 2025-05-21 12:26 p.m., Ryan Eatmon via lists.openembedded.org wrote: >> With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. > > Do you mean *now*generating a compile error? Sigh... yes. Me speak/type good. =P I'll send a v2. > > I guess the YP AB doesn't have a build that catches this target. > > >> ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: >> error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; >> expected 0, have 3 >> >> Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new >> error. > It would be better to file a bug or at least send the > maintainer a patch or a bug description. That's: > > Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> > > from: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/bluetooth/sbc.git/tree/README > > Anyway, we do have 17 other such work-arounds: > > poky.git > ❯ rg gnu17 | wc -l > 17 > > so one more won't hurt that much! > > ../Randy > > >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon<reatmon@ti.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 >> >> inherit autotools pkgconfig >> >> +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" >> + >> PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" >> FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*" >> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. >> View/Reply Online (#217048):https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/217048 >> Mute This Topic:https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/113232263/3616765 >> Group Owner:openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org >> Unsubscribe:https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [randy.macleod@windriver.com] >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> > > -- > # Randy MacLeod > # Wind River Linux >
On 5/21/2025 11:55 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On 2025-05-21 12:26 p.m., Ryan Eatmon via lists.openembedded.org wrote: >> With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. > > Do you mean *now*generating a compile error? > > > I guess the YP AB doesn't have a build that catches this target. > > >> ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: >> error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; >> expected 0, have 3 >> >> Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new >> error. > It would be better to file a bug or at least send the > maintainer a patch or a bug description. That's: > > Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> > > from: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/bluetooth/sbc.git/tree/README Sent bug report. > Anyway, we do have 17 other such work-arounds: > > poky.git > ❯ rg gnu17 | wc -l > 17 > > so one more won't hurt that much! > > ../Randy > > >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon<reatmon@ti.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 >> >> inherit autotools pkgconfig >> >> +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" >> + >> PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" >> FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*" >> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. >> View/Reply Online (#217048):https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/217048 >> Mute This Topic:https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/113232263/3616765 >> Group Owner:openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org >> Unsubscribe:https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [randy.macleod@windriver.com] >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> > > -- > # Randy MacLeod > # Wind River Linux >
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:26 AM Ryan Eatmon via lists.openembedded.org <reatmon=ti.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. > > ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: > error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; > expected 0, have 3 > > Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new > error. > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com> > --- > meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 > > inherit autotools pkgconfig > > +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" maybe changing static void __attribute__((naked)) sbc_analyze_eight_armv6() to static void __attribute__((naked)) sbc_analyze_eight_armv6(const unsigned char *buffer, int size, int channels) in that file helps ? > + > PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" > FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*" > -- > 2.17.1 > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#217048): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/217048 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/113232263/1997914 > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
On 5/21/2025 3:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:26 AM Ryan Eatmon via lists.openembedded.org > <reatmon=ti.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: >> >> With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. >> >> ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: >> error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; >> expected 0, have 3 >> >> Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new >> error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb >> @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 >> >> inherit autotools pkgconfig >> >> +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" > > maybe changing > static void __attribute__((naked)) sbc_analyze_eight_armv6() > > to > static void __attribute__((naked)) sbc_analyze_eight_armv6(const > unsigned char *buffer, int size, int channels) > > in that file helps ? Likely that would help. I guess the philosophy question is... Patch the source code vs. Lower the C standard to match what the existing source was developed under? What is the preferred method for handling things like this? > > >> + >> PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" >> FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*" >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> >> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. >> View/Reply Online (#217048): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/217048 >> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/113232263/1997914 >> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com] >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 7:04 AM Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com> wrote: > > > > On 5/21/2025 3:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:26 AM Ryan Eatmon via lists.openembedded.org > > <reatmon=ti.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > >> > >> With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. > >> > >> ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: > >> error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; > >> expected 0, have 3 > >> > >> Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new > >> error. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com> > >> --- > >> meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > >> index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 > >> --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb > >> @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 > >> > >> inherit autotools pkgconfig > >> > >> +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" > > > > maybe changing > > static void __attribute__((naked)) sbc_analyze_eight_armv6() > > > > to > > static void __attribute__((naked)) sbc_analyze_eight_armv6(const > > unsigned char *buffer, int size, int channels) > > > > in that file helps ? > > Likely that would help. I guess the philosophy question is... > > Patch the source code vs. Lower the C standard to match what the > existing source was developed under? > > What is the preferred method for handling things like this? I think it's subjective. distro hat on you want to do minimal changes and perhaps pinning to C17 is fine, but we won't know when to remove it unless we put some markers so its technical debt we will carry However, fixing the package itself is paying the debt now and helps the ecosystem but it does mean some extra work in upstreaming the patch I know you have already reported the bug but this is one step more to provide a potential fix as well. > > > > > > >> + > >> PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" > >> FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*" > >> -- > >> 2.17.1 > >> > >> > >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > >> View/Reply Online (#217048): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/217048 > >> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/113232263/1997914 > >> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com] > >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >> > > -- > Ryan Eatmon reatmon@ti.com > ----------------------------------------- > Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS
diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb index 5aaa52313f..8b91e7e65b 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "426633cabd7c798236443516dfa8335b47e004b0ef37ff107e0c7ead32 inherit autotools pkgconfig +CFLAGS += "-std=gnu17" + PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-examples" FILES:${PN}-examples += "${bindir}/*"
With the move to gcc 15, the code is not generating a compile error. ../sbc-2.1/sbc/sbc_primitives_armv6.c:284:9: error: too many arguments to function 'sbc_analyze_eight_armv6'; expected 0, have 3 Simple fix is to drop the C standard down to gnu17 to avoid this new error. Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com> --- meta/recipes-multimedia/sbc/sbc_2.1.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)