Message ID | 20220124174012.3916927-2-ross.burton@arm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] CI: update for meta-zephyr changes | expand |
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:40:12PM +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > yocto-check-layers is very greedy when searching for layers, and will > find the test layers in Bitbake if given the chance, for example: > > bitbake/lib/layerindexlib/tests/testdata/layer4 > > This layer has the collection name openembedded-layer and is only > compatible with Sumo. The selection of layer from collection name is > not deterministic, so it's possible that this layer is selected which > then fails the check as it isn't compatible. > > Solve this by restricting the dependency layers in meta-arm to just > meta-arm/meta-*, so it doesn't recurse into meta-arm/work/poky/bitbake. FWIW, I've fallen into this trap before - should this Sumo remnant be removed from Bitbake then? > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> > --- > .gitlab-ci.yml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml > index 9a60f672..4c5d74e9 100644 > --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml > +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ check-layers: > extends: .setup > script: > - kas shell --update --force-checkout ci/base.yml:ci/meta-openembedded.yml --command \ > - "yocto-check-layer-wrapper $CI_PROJECT_DIR/$LAYER --dependency $CI_PROJECT_DIR $KAS_WORK_DIR/meta-openembedded/meta-oe --no-auto-dependency" > + "yocto-check-layer-wrapper $CI_PROJECT_DIR/$LAYER --dependency $CI_PROJECT_DIR/meta-* $KAS_WORK_DIR/meta-openembedded/meta-oe --no-auto-dependency" > parallel: > matrix: > - LAYER: [meta-arm, meta-arm-bsp, meta-arm-toolchain, meta-gem5] > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 18:06, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > FWIW, I've fallen into this trap before - should this Sumo remnant be removed > from Bitbake then? No, the layer shouldn't be found in the first place. I'm adding a check to the tool so that if the layer searching goes a bit haywire and finds these it aborts early instead of giving weird failures. Ross
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml index 9a60f672..4c5d74e9 100644 --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ check-layers: extends: .setup script: - kas shell --update --force-checkout ci/base.yml:ci/meta-openembedded.yml --command \ - "yocto-check-layer-wrapper $CI_PROJECT_DIR/$LAYER --dependency $CI_PROJECT_DIR $KAS_WORK_DIR/meta-openembedded/meta-oe --no-auto-dependency" + "yocto-check-layer-wrapper $CI_PROJECT_DIR/$LAYER --dependency $CI_PROJECT_DIR/meta-* $KAS_WORK_DIR/meta-openembedded/meta-oe --no-auto-dependency" parallel: matrix: - LAYER: [meta-arm, meta-arm-bsp, meta-arm-toolchain, meta-gem5]
yocto-check-layers is very greedy when searching for layers, and will find the test layers in Bitbake if given the chance, for example: bitbake/lib/layerindexlib/tests/testdata/layer4 This layer has the collection name openembedded-layer and is only compatible with Sumo. The selection of layer from collection name is not deterministic, so it's possible that this layer is selected which then fails the check as it isn't compatible. Solve this by restricting the dependency layers in meta-arm to just meta-arm/meta-*, so it doesn't recurse into meta-arm/work/poky/bitbake. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> --- .gitlab-ci.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)