From patchwork Thu Aug 27 06:31:29 2026 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yogita Urade X-Patchwork-Id: 96542 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CB0C61DB9 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 06:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc01-g2.30575.1787812291872326175 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 23:31:32 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="dkim: message contains an insecure body length tag" header.i=@cisco.com header.s=iport01 header.b=k+4BreY9; spf=pass (domain: cisco.com, ip: 173.37.142.95, mailfrom: yurade@cisco.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7535; q=dns/txt; s=iport01; t=1787812291; x=1789021891; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ouNzZC4S8kfxgeGk6bImj7wkegHhiwPERqU7Hm1z9yM=; b=k+4BreY9wNgZRJC6HcEz+VgkliZouB0Y+kx0wR3yd/x6tYhKxHR/p0Sh Q+WGF+qZ8KV/8sn6Gwb0bWOC2dQ7ECJd7LiKhqTGapejD+zdL/UZJtxNk qVYR2OJQ60cGv5NQm7I9HHNwsYDtNRYUncYffFmuP6OYU4U3YfipC19/t PNg7oLLeBc5l1ofyAvBu+VjS32aHd++wlUIVW7n/yR98WPLIDVkFhtfbW /GQXbLcCN9+FVx3mTGWQKTYvAaQGA2BvTupcjh/I10J/cLwXyRxxi7iXf W9foN1d7QXCVC7iNYFqjFo+I+zx0qP4sBWPWoM3dIlv1eJvQgoBZG7NL+ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: X+MeFn1dQ2GEWnGmBpS6gQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FN/CNo7RQfu6Ps76alqL2g== X-IPAS-Result: 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 IronPort-Data: A9a23:DyeBfKnqlVptr9nFRSpLT/vo5gzVJ0RdPkR7XQ2eYbSJt1+Wr1Gzt xIcCmvXOK2PZmv0ctlybdjio04PuMDXzt4xGgs5/iw1EltH+JHPbTi7wugcHM8zwunrFh8PA xA2M4GYRCwMZiaC4E/raf658SUUOZigHtLUEPTDNj16WThqQSIgjQMLs+Mii+aEu/Dha++2k Y20+ZC31GONgWYubDpEsf3b8XuDgdyr0N8mlg1mDRx0lAe2e0k9VPo3Oay3Jn3kdYhYdsbSb /rD1ryw4lTC9B4rDN6/+p6jGqHdauePVeQmoiM+t5mK2nCulARrukoIHKZ0hXNsttm8t4sZJ OOhGnCHYVxB0qXkwIzxWvTDes10FfUuFLTveRBTvSEPpqHLWyOE/hlgMK05Fb1b3+tZBzhCz KY3BQ8LQRWpn9noz4vuH4GAhux7RCXqFIobvnclyXTSCuwrBMicBa7L/tRfmjw3g6iiH96HO JFfMmQpNUqGOkETUrsUIMpWcOOAl2TlejFVgFmUvqEwpWPUyWSd1ZC9aoCPJYPTFZQ9ckCwi ESB1EL+XSsjOsHB8SHarHuon8uVknauMG4VPPjinhJwu3WU3mEVBRgcWFe3rPX8gUmkVvpbK lcI4WwptaU0+UmhQ9XxUhH+p2SL1iPwQPJZF+k8rQXIwa3O7kPBWS4PTyVKb5ots8peqSEW6 2JlVujBXVRH2IB5g1rHnltIhVte4RQoEFI= IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:LPFmwKlyLA5vi7dkGbkauaffPfrpDfIA3DAbv31ZSRFFG/Fw8P re+MjzuiWbtN98YhwdcJW7Scq9qBDnhPtICPcqXItKNTOO0ADDEGgh1/qB/9SKIULDH4BmuZ uIC5IfNPTASX5nkM39/A60V/wkwNWB7eSUoN229QYLcemvAJsQljuQzW2gYytLeDU= X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:1EAWOGHMEiiks5g8qmJXt2sZNMZ8fkSH41rvJWC9I35SFrKsHAo= X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:HpE9sAxw+LY1BQ32oP4EyTmLN0maqIqIT2srlso8gseZaxRrZGmUiC2TGIByfw== X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,246,1779148800"; d="scan'208";a="822277189" Received: from alln-l-core-07.cisco.com ([173.36.16.144]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384; 27 Aug 2026 06:31:31 +0000 Received: from sjc-ads-7871.cisco.com (sjc-ads-7871.cisco.com [10.30.222.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by alln-l-core-07.cisco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D671D180001DC for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 06:31:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: by sjc-ads-7871.cisco.com (Postfix, from userid 1889728) id 6D7B7CEF860; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 23:31:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Yogita Urade To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 2/2] python3-pyasn1: fix CVE-2026-59885 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 23:31:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20260827063129.3205882-2-yurade@cisco.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.6 In-Reply-To: <20260827063129.3205882-1-yurade@cisco.com> References: <20260827063129.3205882-1-yurade@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Outbound-Client-TLS: ANONYMOUS;sjc-ads-7871.cisco.com [10.30.222.158];TLSv1.3;TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384;256 X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.30.222.158, sjc-ads-7871.cisco.com X-Outbound-Node: alln-l-core-07.cisco.com List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 06:31:36 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/244456 This patch applies the upstream fix as referenced in [2], using the commit shown in [1]. [1] https://github.com/pyasn1/pyasn1/commit/45bdb19eb7df4b3780fe9c912c63e99bffc39dd9 [2] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59885 Signed-off-by: Yogita Urade --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python-pyasn1.inc | 1 + .../python3-pyasn1/CVE-2026-59885.patch | 184 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 185 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyasn1/CVE-2026-59885.patch -- 2.35.6 diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyasn1.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyasn1.inc index d69cdf8877..ec06281612 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyasn1.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pyasn1.inc @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ SRC_URI += " \ file://run-ptest \ file://CVE-2026-23490.patch \ file://CVE-2026-30922.patch \ + file://CVE-2026-59885.patch \ " RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest += " \ diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyasn1/CVE-2026-59885.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyasn1/CVE-2026-59885.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d8cc924875 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyasn1/CVE-2026-59885.patch @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +From 865e458893e475ab2e6a46022329f7f4870e8044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Simon Pichugin +Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 17:37:40 -0700 +Subject: [PATCH] Merge commit from fork + +CVE: CVE-2026-59885 +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/pyasn1/pyasn1/commit/45bdb19eb7df4b3780fe9c912c63e99bffc39dd9] + +Backport Changes: +- Omitted RelativeOID decoder and encoder changes, together with their + decoder and encoder regression tests, because RelativeOID support was + introduced in pyasn1 0.6.0 and is absent from pyasn1 0.5.1 + +(cherry picked from commit 45bdb19eb7df4b3780fe9c912c63e99bffc39dd9) +Signed-off-by: Yogita Urade +--- + pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py | 18 ++++++++++-------- + pyasn1/codec/ber/encoder.py | 12 ++++++------ + tests/codec/ber/test_decoder.py | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ + tests/codec/ber/test_encoder.py | 10 ++++++++++ + 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py b/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py +index da2a048..72c9cb5 100644 +--- a/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py ++++ b/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py +@@ -424,14 +424,14 @@ class ObjectIdentifierPayloadDecoder(AbstractSimplePayloadDecoder): + + chunk = octs2ints(chunk) + +- oid = () ++ oid = [] + index = 0 + substrateLen = len(chunk) + while index < substrateLen: + subId = chunk[index] + index += 1 + if subId < 128: +- oid += (subId,) ++ oid.append(subId) + elif subId > 128: + # Construct subid from a number of octets + nextSubId = subId +@@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ class ObjectIdentifierPayloadDecoder(AbstractSimplePayloadDecoder): + subId = (subId << 7) + (nextSubId & 0x7F) + if index >= substrateLen: + raise error.SubstrateUnderrunError( +- 'Short substrate for sub-OID past %s' % (oid,) ++ 'Short substrate for sub-OID past %s' % (tuple(oid),) + ) + nextSubId = chunk[index] + index += 1 +- oid += ((subId << 7) + nextSubId,) ++ oid.append((subId << 7) + nextSubId) + elif subId == 128: + # ASN.1 spec forbids leading zeros (0x80) in OID + # encoding, tolerating it opens a vulnerability. See +@@ -461,15 +461,17 @@ class ObjectIdentifierPayloadDecoder(AbstractSimplePayloadDecoder): + + # Decode two leading arcs + if 0 <= oid[0] <= 39: +- oid = (0,) + oid ++ oid.insert(0, 0) + elif 40 <= oid[0] <= 79: +- oid = (1, oid[0] - 40) + oid[1:] ++ oid[0] -= 40 ++ oid.insert(0, 1) + elif oid[0] >= 80: +- oid = (2, oid[0] - 80) + oid[1:] ++ oid[0] -= 80 ++ oid.insert(0, 2) + else: + raise error.PyAsn1Error('Malformed first OID octet: %s' % chunk[0]) + +- yield self._createComponent(asn1Spec, tagSet, oid, **options) ++ yield self._createComponent(asn1Spec, tagSet, tuple(oid), **options) + + + class RealPayloadDecoder(AbstractSimplePayloadDecoder): +diff --git a/pyasn1/codec/ber/encoder.py b/pyasn1/codec/ber/encoder.py +index c59b43e..7c3c5cf 100644 +--- a/pyasn1/codec/ber/encoder.py ++++ b/pyasn1/codec/ber/encoder.py +@@ -327,30 +327,30 @@ class ObjectIdentifierEncoder(AbstractItemEncoder): + else: + raise error.PyAsn1Error('Impossible first/second arcs at %s' % (value,)) + +- octets = () ++ octets = [] + + # Cycle through subIds + for subOid in oid: + if 0 <= subOid <= 127: + # Optimize for the common case +- octets += (subOid,) ++ octets.append(subOid) + + elif subOid > 127: + # Pack large Sub-Object IDs +- res = (subOid & 0x7f,) ++ res = [subOid & 0x7f] + subOid >>= 7 + + while subOid: +- res = (0x80 | (subOid & 0x7f),) + res ++ res.append(0x80 | (subOid & 0x7f)) + subOid >>= 7 + + # Add packed Sub-Object ID to resulted Object ID +- octets += res ++ octets.extend(reversed(res)) + + else: + raise error.PyAsn1Error('Negative OID arc %s at %s' % (subOid, value)) + +- return octets, False, False ++ return tuple(octets), False, False + + + class RealEncoder(AbstractItemEncoder): +diff --git a/tests/codec/ber/test_decoder.py b/tests/codec/ber/test_decoder.py +index 62aa1c5..c7a75cb 100644 +--- a/tests/codec/ber/test_decoder.py ++++ b/tests/codec/ber/test_decoder.py +@@ -26,6 +26,14 @@ from pyasn1.compat.octets import ints2octs, str2octs, null + from pyasn1 import error + + ++def encode_length(length): ++ if length < 128: ++ return bytes([length]) ++ ++ lengthBytes = length.to_bytes((length.bit_length() + 7) // 8, 'big') ++ return bytes([0x80 | len(lengthBytes)]) + lengthBytes ++ ++ + class LargeTagDecoderTestCase(BaseTestCase): + def testLargeTag(self): + assert decoder.decode(ints2octs((127, 141, 245, 182, 253, 47, 3, 2, 1, 1))) == (1, null) +@@ -450,6 +458,20 @@ class ObjectIdentifierDecoderTestCase(BaseTestCase): + ints2octs((0x06, 0x13, 0x88, 0x37, 0x83, 0xC6, 0xDF, 0xD4, 0xCC, 0xB3, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFE, 0xF0, 0xB8, 0xD6, 0xB8, 0xCB, 0xE2, 0xB6, 0x47)) + ) == ((2, 999, 18446744073709551535184467440737095), null) + ++ def testManySingleByteArcs(self): ++ encodedArcCount = 4096 ++ substrate = ( ++ bytes([0x06]) + ++ encode_length(encodedArcCount) + ++ bytes([0x01] * encodedArcCount) ++ ) ++ ++ value, rest = decoder.decode(substrate) ++ assert rest == b'' ++ assert len(value) == encodedArcCount + 1 ++ assert tuple(value[:3]) == (0, 1, 1) ++ assert tuple(value[-3:]) == (1, 1, 1) ++ + def testExcessiveContinuationOctets(self): + """Test that OID arcs with excessive continuation octets are rejected.""" + # Create a payload with 25 continuation octets (exceeds 20 limit) +diff --git a/tests/codec/ber/test_encoder.py b/tests/codec/ber/test_encoder.py +index 3d7567a..ef38eef 100644 +--- a/tests/codec/ber/test_encoder.py ++++ b/tests/codec/ber/test_encoder.py +@@ -349,6 +349,16 @@ class ObjectIdentifierEncoderTestCase(BaseTestCase): + ) == ints2octs((0x06, 0x13, 0x88, 0x37, 0x83, 0xC6, 0xDF, 0xD4, 0xCC, 0xB3, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFE, 0xF0, 0xB8, 0xD6, + 0xB8, 0xCB, 0xE2, 0xB6, 0x47)) + ++ def testManySingleByteArcs(self): ++ arcCount = 4096 ++ substrate = encoder.encode( ++ univ.ObjectIdentifier((1, 3) + (1,) * arcCount) ++ ) ++ ++ assert substrate == ( ++ bytes([0x06, 0x82, 0x10, 0x01, 0x2B]) + bytes([0x01] * arcCount) ++ ) ++ + + class ObjectIdentifierWithSchemaEncoderTestCase(BaseTestCase): + def testOne(self): +-- +2.44.1 +