From patchwork Tue May 24 15:23:53 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ross Burton X-Patchwork-Id: 8440 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E70C433F5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.10769.1653405845970083034 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 08:24:06 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: arm.com, ip: 217.140.110.172, mailfrom: ross.burton@arm.com) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF36B23A; Tue, 24 May 2022 08:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oss-tx204.lab.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81B3D3F70D; Tue, 24 May 2022 08:24:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Ross Burton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: nd@arm.com Subject: [PATCH 1/9] lzo: Add further info to a patch Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 16:23:53 +0100 Message-Id: <20220524152401.1663317-1-ross.burton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:24:07 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/166071 From: Richard Purdie Add some further info to the patch based on upsream changes. Given the last release in 2017 and glaring issues on at least armv5, it does raise the question on whether we should drop this. There are probably better compression tools now. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch index db3a70e8031..4e6ca4132b5 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ Change suggested by Julian Taylor. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 +RP: Patch is still in debian as of 20220524 in a revised form: +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/ +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/0001-Conditionally-replace-reinvention-of-memcpy-with-cal.patch/ + +We likely need this in OE to prevent against unaligned accesses +on systems such as armv5. + Upstream-Status: Pending Signed-off-by: Saul Wold ---